From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>
To: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: accel: add adi,adxl345.yaml binding
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 12:39:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10cb0df218036cfd779d2c5e2555959fb5bef242.camel@analog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190506114610.28083-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 14:46 +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> This patch adds a YAML binding for the Analog Devices ADXL345 I2C/SPI
> accelerometer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> ---
>
> And now for the RFC part.
> Normally, I would dig into source-code to try to figure this out, but at
> this point-in-time, I am low on time/energy to do this.
> And maybe this helps trigger a discussion about this.
>
> Apologies if this has been coverted on the devicetree mailing list, but
> at least we'd get some coverage on the IIO list (with this).
>
> The ADXL345 device (as others) supports both I2C & SPI interfaces.
>
> Question1: do we write 2 YAML files, or 1 ? I was looking at Zephyr (for
> some ideas/reference) but it seems to me that the YAML DT binding format
> is
> different than this one ? They write 2 files for ADXL372 (1 for SPI, 1
> for
> I2C).
>
> Question1-a: one thing is that SPI requires some props to be `required`
> that would not be required for the I2C binding. This could be solved by
> doing 2 files, but if doing 1 YAML file, is there a way to do conditional
> `required` ? i.e. property is required if `SPI` ? not sure how to check
> for
> SPI vs I2C, it would be interesting (at some point) to somehow enforce
> SPI/I2C bindings correctness.
>
> Question2: `make dt_binding_check` seems to generate only the first
> example. Is this known behavior, or do I need to take something else into
> consideration ?
>
> Question3: one idea that was neat in Zephyr, is that there is a
> 'inherits'
> + `!include` mechanism for including common SPI & I2C device stuff. It
> would be neat to have this. Is there a way to do this now, or maybe this
> would come later ? Maybe, just having a way to include a YAML file into
> another would be interesting.
>
> .../bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..246b90c07aaa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/accelerometers/adi,adxl345.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Analog Devices ADXL345/ADXL375 3-Axis Digital Accelerometers
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + Driver for Analog Devices ADXL345/ADXL375 3-Axis Digital
> Accelerometers
> + http://www.analog.com/en/products/mems/accelerometers/adxl345.html
> +
> http://www.analog.com/en/products/sensors-mems/accelerometers/adxl375.html
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - adi,adxl345
> + - adi,adxl375
> +
> + reg:
> + description:
> + The I2C address or SPI chip select number of the sensor
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + spi-cpha:
> + description:
> + SPI clock phase must be set, to select SPI mode 3
> +
> + spi-cpol:
> + description:
> + SPI clock polarity must be set, to select SPI mode 3
> +
> + interrupts:
> + description:
> + A variable number of interrupts warrants a description of what
> conditions
> + affect the number of interrupts. Otherwise, descriptions on
> standard
> + properties are not necessary.
> +
oops,
since i left this un-changed
oh, well, it's an RFC anyway :)
it would have received a V2 anyway
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + /* Example for a I2C device node */
> + accelerometer@2a {
> + compatible = "adi,adxl345";
> + reg = <0x53>;
> + };
> + - |
> + /* Example for a SPI device node */
> + accelerometer@0 {
> + compatible = "adi,adxl345";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <5000000>;
> + spi-cpol;
> + spi-cpha;
> + };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-06 11:46 [RFC][PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: accel: add adi,adxl345.yaml binding Alexandru Ardelean
2019-05-06 12:39 ` Ardelean, Alexandru [this message]
2019-05-06 14:17 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-06 14:29 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-05-13 17:25 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-14 6:28 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10cb0df218036cfd779d2c5e2555959fb5bef242.camel@analog.com \
--to=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).