From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, <lars@metafoo.de>,
<Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>, <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
<pmeerw@pmeerw.net>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: iio: adc: ad7280a: split ad7280_channel_init() to more functions
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:43:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204124350.00005fe0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203200641.GA1330@t480s.localdomain>
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:06:41 +0100
Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm> wrote:
> On gru 02, 2018 15:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 12:58:28 +0100
> > Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm> wrote:
> >
> > > The ad7280_channel_init function has been split into more specific
> > > functions to increase the code readability.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
> > Hi Slawomir,
>
> Hi
>
> > A few comments inline. I agree with the basic idea, but suggest
> > a slight different balance in where things are handled.
>
> Thank you for the review. I agree with the comments, but please see one remark
> below.
>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> > > index 7a0ba26f9fd9..a6b1bdd9f372 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> > > @@ -496,6 +496,75 @@ static const struct attribute_group ad7280_attrs_group = {
> > > .attrs = ad7280_attributes,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static void ad7280_voltage_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st, int cnt,
> > > + int dev, int ch)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &st->channels[cnt];
> >
> > Pass the chan spec in here instead of the _state structure.
> > It will give cleaner code and better visibility on the scope of
> > this function where it is called.
> >
> > > +
> > > + chan->type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> > > + chan->differential = 1;
> > > + chan->channel = (dev * 6) + ch;
> >
> > This offset does seem more than a little random buried away in this function.
> > I would pass it in explicitly as a parameter so that the we have all the
> > channel number manipulations visible in one place.
> >
> > > + chan->channel2 = chan->channel + 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ad7280_temp_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st, int cnt, int dev,
> > > + int ch)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &st->channels[cnt];
> > > +
> > > + chan->type = IIO_TEMP;
> > > + chan->channel = (dev * 6) + ch - 6;
> > This one is even more obscure when found in here. Pass it in as an additional parameter.
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ad7280_common_fields_init(struct ad7280_state *st, int cnt, int dev,
> > > + int ch)
> >
> > It's not really the common fields given the voltage version is different.
> > Perhaps there is a better name for this function?
>
> I don't understand. The fields of the chan in this function are set to the same
> values for volt and temp channels (this function is called at the end of the
> for loop regardless of the AD type of the channel). I do not see how the voltage
> version is different.
It's the all voltage one that is different. My mistake.
>
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &st->channels[cnt];
> > > +
> > > + chan->indexed = 1;
> > > + chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> > > + chan->info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > > + chan->address = ad7280a_devaddr(dev) << 8 | ch;
> > > + chan->scan_index = cnt;
> > > + chan->scan_type.sign = 'u';
> > > + chan->scan_type.realbits = 12;
> > > + chan->scan_type.storagebits = 32;
> > > + chan->scan_type.shift = 0;
> >
> > I doubt there is any need to set shift and 0 is the obvious default
> > so no 'documentation' benefit in doing it here.
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ad7280_all_voltage_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st, int cnt,
> > > + int dev)
> > Total voltage perhaps rather than 'all'?
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &st->channels[cnt];
> > > +
> > > + chan->type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> > > + chan->differential = 1;
> > > + chan->channel = 0;
> > > + chan->channel2 = dev * 6;
> > > + chan->address = AD7280A_ALL_CELLS;
> > > + chan->indexed = 1;
> > > + chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> > > + chan->info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > > + chan->scan_index = cnt;
> > > + chan->scan_type.sign = 'u';
> > > + chan->scan_type.realbits = 32;
> > > + chan->scan_type.storagebits = 32;
> > > + chan->scan_type.shift = 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ad7280_timestamp_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st, int cnt)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &st->channels[cnt];
> > > +
> > > + chan->type = IIO_TIMESTAMP;
> > > + chan->channel = -1;
> > > + chan->scan_index = cnt;
> > > + chan->scan_type.sign = 's';
> > > + chan->scan_type.realbits = 64;
> > > + chan->scan_type.storagebits = 64;
> > > + chan->scan_type.shift = 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int ad7280_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
> > > {
> > > int dev, ch, cnt;
> > > @@ -508,51 +577,17 @@ static int ad7280_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
> > > for (dev = 0, cnt = 0; dev <= st->slave_num; dev++)
> > > for (ch = AD7280A_CELL_VOLTAGE_1; ch <= AD7280A_AUX_ADC_6;
> > > ch++, cnt++) {
> > > - if (ch < AD7280A_AUX_ADC_1) {
> > > - st->channels[cnt].type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].differential = 1;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel = (dev * 6) + ch;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel2 =
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel + 1;
> > > - } else {
> > > - st->channels[cnt].type = IIO_TEMP;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel = (dev * 6) + ch - 6;
> > > - }
> > > - st->channels[cnt].indexed = 1;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].info_mask_separate =
> > > - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> > > - st->channels[cnt].info_mask_shared_by_type =
> > > - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > > - st->channels[cnt].address =
> > > - ad7280a_devaddr(dev) << 8 | ch;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_index = cnt;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.sign = 'u';
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.realbits = 12;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.storagebits = 32;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.shift = 0;
> > > + if (ch < AD7280A_AUX_ADC_1)
> > > + ad7280_voltage_channel_init(st, cnt, dev, ch);
> > > + else
> > > + ad7280_temp_channel_init(st, cnt, dev, ch);
> > > +
> > > + ad7280_common_fields_init(st, cnt, dev, ch);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - st->channels[cnt].type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].differential = 1;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel = 0;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel2 = dev * 6;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].address = AD7280A_ALL_CELLS;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].indexed = 1;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> > > - st->channels[cnt].info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_index = cnt;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.sign = 'u';
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.realbits = 32;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.storagebits = 32;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.shift = 0;
> > > + ad7280_all_voltage_channel_init(st, cnt, dev);
> > > cnt++;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].type = IIO_TIMESTAMP;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].channel = -1;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_index = cnt;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.sign = 's';
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.realbits = 64;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.storagebits = 64;
> > > - st->channels[cnt].scan_type.shift = 0;
> > > + ad7280_timestamp_channel_init(st, cnt);
> > >
> > > return cnt + 1;
> > > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-02 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] staging: iio: adc: ad7280a: channel and attr init refactor Slawomir Stepien
2018-12-02 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: iio: adc: ad7280a: split ad7280_channel_init() to more functions Slawomir Stepien
2018-12-02 15:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-12-03 20:06 ` Slawomir Stepien
2018-12-04 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-12-02 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: iio: adc: ad7280a: split ad7280_attr_init() " Slawomir Stepien
2018-12-02 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-12-02 11:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: iio: adc: ad7280a: add braces to complex for loops Slawomir Stepien
2018-12-02 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181204124350.00005fe0@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=sst@poczta.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).