Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: (bma400) add driver for the BMA400

[Dan Robertson <dan@dlrobertson.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5354 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:23:38AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:44 AM Dan Robertson <dan@dlrobertson.com> wrote:
> > + * bma400.h - Register constants and other forward declarations
> > + *            needed by the bma400 sources.
>
> Including file name in the file is not the best practice. Imagine if
> by some reason we will need to rename it (to support more sensors, for
> example, and reflect it by replacing 00 -> 0x).
> So, please, remove here and everywhere else.

That makes sense.

> > +#define BMA400_TWO_BITS_MASK    0x03
> > +#define BMA400_LP_OSR_MASK      0x60
> > +#define BMA400_NP_OSR_MASK      0x30
> > +#define BMA400_ACC_ODR_MASK     0x0f
> > +#define BMA400_ACC_SCALE_MASK   0xc0
> 
> GENMASK()
> (Don't forget to include bits.h for it)

Thanks.

> > +static const int bma400_scale_table[] = {
> > +       0, 38344,
> > +       0, 76590,
> > +       0, 153277,
> 
> > +       0, 306457
> 
> Better to leave comma here. It doesn't matter for this device, but
> make of use the better practices.
> > +};
> 
> Also, I'm wondering why values are not exactly multiply by 2. Is in DS
> of the chip any explanation for this?

It would be a multiply by 2. I tried to follow the bma180 driver here, but I'm
starting to think that may be the wrong approach.

> > +static const int bma400_osr_table[] = { 0, 1, 3 };
> 
> > +/* See the ACC_CONFIG1 section of the datasheet */
> > +static const int bma400_sample_freqs[] = {
> > +       12,  500000,
> > +       25,  0,
> > +       50,  0,
> > +       100, 0,
> > +       200, 0,
> > +       400, 0,
> > +       800, 0,
> > +};
> 
> This can be replaced by a formula(s).

Yeah I think I can implement the get, set, and read functions for sample_freq
with a formula, but the scale and sample frequency tables are needed by the
implementation of read_avail. A implementation of read_avail with a range and
a step would be ideal, but I couldn't find any documentation on implementing
read_avail where the step value of the range is a multiple. Please correct
me if I've missed something.

Note that this applies to the scale table as well.

> > +struct bma400_sample_freq {
> > +       int hz;
> > +       int uhz;
> > +};
> 
> I'm wondering why above table is not using this struct.

Originally it did, but I changed this in the second version when I added support
for iio_info read_avail to try to be a little closer to other implementations of
iio_read avail.

> > +const struct regmap_config bma400_regmap_config = {
> > +       .reg_bits = 8,
> > +       .val_bits = 8,
> > +       .max_register = BMA400_CMD_REG,
> > +       .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> > +       .writeable_reg = bma400_is_writable_reg,
> > +       .volatile_reg = bma400_is_volatile_reg,
> > +};
> 
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bma400_regmap_config);
> 
> Why? And why it's not _GPL?

This is used by the bma400_i2c module.

> > +       int ret;
> > +       int host_temp;
> > +       unsigned int raw_temp;
> 
> Better reversed xmas tree order.

Sounds good.

> 
> > +               if (idx + 1 >= ARRAY_SIZE(bma400_sample_freqs)) {
> 
> Why do you need this churn with +1 and = ?

Since we've "flattened" the array of sample frequency we need to ensure that the
Hz (bma400_sample_freqs[idx]) and uHz (bma400_sample_freqs[idx + 1]) are both
valid. This will be negated in the next version as I'll switch to a formula.
Instead I'll ensure the returned ODR value is not above 0x0b.

> > +                       dev_err(data->dev, "sample freq index is too high");
> > +                       ret = -EINVAL;
> > +                       goto error;
> > +               }
> 
> 
> > +       for (i = 0; i + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE(bma400_sample_freqs); i += 2) {
> 
> Using defined struct will guarantee you to have always 2x members in
> the array. So, drop this arithmetic churn.

I should be able to figure out how to use a formula here, but I see where you're
coming from and I agree.

> > +       if (ret < 0) {
> > +               dev_err(data->dev, "Failed to read chip id register: %x!", ret);
> 
> %x for returned error code is too hackerish.

Makes sense. I'll change this in the update.

> > +               return ret;
> 
> > +       } else if (val != BMA400_ID_REG_VAL) {
> 
> Redundant 'else'

> > +               dev_err(data->dev, "CHIP ID MISMATCH: %x!", ret);
> 
> Hacker detected!

:)

> > +               return -ENODEV;
> > +       }
> 
> > +               /*
> > +                * TODO: The datasheet waits 1500us here in the example, but
> > +                * lists 2/ODR as the wakeup time.
> > +                */
> > +               usleep_range(1500, 20000);
> 
> These range values are too sparse. Usually the second one is less than
> first one * 2.
> Fix it now.

Good to know. I'll fix this in the update.

> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bma400_probe);
> 
> Why is not GPL?

Ah, saw in the docs "GPL" means GPL-2.0.

> 
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bma400_remove);
> 
> Ditto.

This symbol is used in bma400_i2c.

> 
> P.S. I probably missed some places with the same mistake as commented
> above. Please address all places in the code where my comments are
> applicable.

Noted. Thanks for the feedback!

Cheers,

 - Dan

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]