linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>, "jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iio: trigger: warn about non-registered iio trigger getting attempt
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 18:03:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220601180326.3b6v4joykv5dryzm@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b808f06ba7532bbfd9c2745420aedfa9464a297.camel@gmail.com>

Jonathan, Nuno,

I've sent RFC patch with trig->owner pointer initialization moval from
register() to allocate() stage as Nuno suggested before:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20220601174837.20292-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru/

Please review if possible and share your thoughts.

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 10:33 +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > Hi Nuno,
> > 
> > Thank you for comments!
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:47:54AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 18:57 +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > > 
> > > > I have one question about a cases when trigger owner is builtin
> > > > module.
> > > > In the such cases trig->owner == null, because THIS_MODULE equals
> > > > to
> > > > null. How do you think, should we take into account such
> > > > situations?
> > > > 
> > > > IMHO we have to take in and save this information to trig_info
> > > > during
> > > > trigger allocation call. For example we can check THIS_MODULE
> > > > from
> > > > the
> > > 
> > > Hmmm, If we were to do something during iio_trigger_alloc(), we
> > > would
> > > rather assign already THIS_MODULE to owner and we would not need
> > > this
> > > WARN(). I mean, if someone calls iio_trigger_get() before
> > > allocating
> > > it, it will have bigger problems :).
> > > 
> > 
> > You are right, non-allocated pointer dereference is much bigger
> > problem :)
> > 
> > > I think this could actually be something reasonable...
> > 
> > I think it could be a good solution, but it's required a lot of
> > changes
> > in the IIO drivers code, because if we assign trig->owner from
> > iio_trigger_alloc(), we do not need this_mod parameter in the
> > iio_trigger_register() iface and its wrappers.
> > So it means to make it workable we must:
> >     - rework iio_trigger_alloc()
> >     - redesign iio_trigger_register() iface and its wrappers
> >     - correct iio_trigger_register() call from all IIO drivers
> > 
> > I suppose we need to wait for Jonathan's comments here...
> > 
> 
> I think we could actually get this done without having to change all
> the drivers. Note on how iio_trigger_register() passes THIS_MODULE to
> the internal API. We could also use macros in the alloc function in a
> way that only internal functions would need to be changed. But it all
> depends on whether or not Jonathan wants this moved...
> 
> - Nuno Sá

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 18:15 [PATCH v1] iio: trigger: warn about non-registered iio trigger getting attempt Dmitry Rokosov
2022-05-31 18:57 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-06-01  8:47   ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-01 10:33     ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-06-01 13:09       ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-01 18:03         ` Dmitry Rokosov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220601180326.3b6v4joykv5dryzm@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru \
    --to=ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).