Re: [PATCH 13/15] iio: sx9310: Add newlines to printks

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Enrico Granata <egranata@chromium.org>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] iio: sx9310: Add newlines to printks
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:24:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <855ea08a4c41bc107f88699230309675bd9075b0.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdSxkgd-+CBTNUJD+WUdOX3e1x3Ysap=D9+33Yo1Kk+yA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 21:19 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:14 PM Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > 
> > Printks in the kernel have newlines at the end. Add them to the few
> 
> Printk()s
> 
> > printks in this driver.
> 
> printk()s

Random kernel pedantry.
This patch should not need to be respun for any of these.

> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > Fixes: 72ad02b15d63 ("iio: Add SEMTECH SX9310/9311 sensor driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
> 
> It has ordering issues
> Should be
> 
> Fixes:
> SoB: Stephen
> Rb: Douglas
> Rb: Daniel
> SoB: Daniel
> 
> 
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > index 3f981d28ee4056..4553ee83a016a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static int sx9310_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >         if (ret) {
> >                 if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> >                         dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> > -                               "0x02 << 3l compensation timed out: 0x%02x",
> > +                               "0x02 << 3l compensation timed out: 0x%02x\n",
> 
> Looks like ping-pong style in the series, i.e. you may fix this when
> you introduced this line.
> 
> Check the rest (and not only printk()s) for the similar style and
> avoid the latter.
> 
> >                                 val);
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> > @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static int sx9310_set_indio_dev_name(struct device *dev,
> > 
> >         ddata = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev);
> >         if (ddata != whoami) {
> > -               dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match device data: %u", whoami);
> > +               dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match device data: %u\n", whoami);
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >         }
> > 
> > @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static int sx9310_set_indio_dev_name(struct device *dev,
> >                 indio_dev->name = "sx9311";
> >                 break;
> >         default:
> > -               dev_err(dev, "unexpected WHOAMI response: %u", whoami);
> > +               dev_err(dev, "unexpected WHOAMI response: %u\n", whoami);
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >         }
> > 
> > @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static int sx9310_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > 
> >         ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_WHOAMI, &data->whoami);
> >         if (ret) {
> > -               dev_err(dev, "error in reading WHOAMI register: %d", ret);
> > +               dev_err(dev, "error in reading WHOAMI register: %d\n", ret);
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> > 
> > --
> > 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog
> > 
> 
> 