From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jose Cazarin <joseespiriki@gmail.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 2/2] iio: dac: dac5571: Fix chip id detection for OF devices
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:20:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkF99t+NlO+IKMXg@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YRwoAgie/mDDunn9@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]
> My point is that this patch shouldn't be needed. I'd like if the I2C
> core could get the driver data from the i2c_device_id table instead of
> duplicating it in the of_device_id. This isn't possible today as
> i2c_match_id() doesn't have the fallback mechanism that OF matching has.
I think the proper fix would be naming the I2C client after the actually
matched compatible property, and not after the first one? I am a bit
afraid of regressions when we change that, however...
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 18:31 [PATCH 0/2] iio: ti-dac5571: Add TI DAC081C081 support Laurent Pinchart
2021-07-23 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: dac: ti,dac5571: " Laurent Pinchart
2021-07-29 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2021-07-23 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: dac: dac5571: Fix chip id detection for OF devices Laurent Pinchart
2021-07-23 23:06 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-23 23:06 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 0:06 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Laurent Pinchart
2021-07-24 14:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-24 23:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-17 20:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-17 20:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-17 20:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-17 21:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-03-24 23:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-03-28 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-03-28 10:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-03-28 12:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-29 0:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-03-29 8:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-07-24 14:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkF99t+NlO+IKMXg@ninjato \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joseespiriki@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@geanix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).