From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>
Cc: robin <robin@protonic.nl>, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-input @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel @ lists . infradead . org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] input: keyboard: snvs_pwrkey: Send key events for i.MX6 S, DL and Q
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:48:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122224840.GE248138@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR04MB6638D79F8C929100F6D96479894E0@VE1PR04MB6638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:17:56PM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-21 0:33, robin <robin@protonic.nl> wrote:
> > On 2019-11-20 10:27, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > Hi Robin,
> > >
> > > On 19-09-16 16:37, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 07:45:37AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> > >> > On 2019/9/13 15:31 robin <robin@protonic.nl> wrote:>
> > >> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 2019-09-12 22:13, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >> > > > Hi Robin,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:23:29AM +0000, Robin van der Gracht
> > wrote:
> > >> > > >> The first generation i.MX6 processors does not send an
> > >> > > >> interrupt when the power key is pressed. It sends a power down
> > >> > > >> request interrupt if the key is released before a hard
> > >> > > >> shutdown (5 second press). This should allow software to bring down
> > the SoC safely.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> For this driver to work as a regular power key with the older
> > >> > > >> SoCs, we need to send a keypress AND release when we get the
> > >> > > >> power down request irq.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>
> > >> > > >> ---
> > >> > > >> @@ -67,13 +83,17 @@ static irqreturn_t
> > >> > > >> imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) {
> > >> > > >> struct platform_device *pdev = dev_id;
> > >> > > >> struct pwrkey_drv_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > >> > > >> + unsigned long expire = jiffies;
> > >> > > >> u32 lp_status;
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> pm_wakeup_event(pdata->input->dev.parent, 0);
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> regmap_read(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, &lp_status);
> > >> > > >> - if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO)
> > >> > > >> - mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer, jiffies +
> > >> > > >> msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME));
> > >> > > >> + if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO) {
> > >> > > >> + if (pdata->minor_rev > 0)
> > >> > > >> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME);
> > >> > > >> + mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer, expire);
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Why do we even need to fire the timer in case of the first
> > >> > > > generation hardware? Just send press and release events directly from
> > the ISR.
> > >> > That timer looks like a software debounce to prevent unexpected and
> > >> > meaningless interrupt/event caused by quick press/release.
> > >>
> > >> Right, but in case of the first generation hardware we schedule the
> > >> timer immediately (expire == 0) and do not check state of the
> > >> hardware in the timer handler, but rather simply emit down/up events,
> > >> so we do not really get any benefit from the timer (again, I am
> > >> talking about first generation hardware only).
> > >
> > > Did you prepared a v4? Just ask to avoid a duplicated work :)
> >
> > No I haven't. Not sure what the public wants. Use timer, don't use timer..
> >
> > v3 has had long term testing though ;)
> Sorry for that I miss the mail.
> Understood a little bit confusion about immediate timer for
> the first press, just stand on the view of clean code shape.
> But I'm okay if you prefer to remove timer in the first interrupt
> generation.
Yes, please prepare v4 without the timer for the first generation of the
hardware.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 6:23 [PATCH v3] input: keyboard: snvs_pwrkey: Send key events for i.MX6 S, DL and Q Robin van der Gracht
2019-09-04 6:52 ` Marco Felsch
2019-09-13 7:39 ` robin
2019-09-12 20:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-13 7:30 ` robin
2019-09-16 7:45 ` Robin Gong
2019-09-16 23:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-11-20 9:27 ` Marco Felsch
2019-11-20 16:32 ` robin
2019-11-21 13:17 ` Robin Gong
2019-11-22 22:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122224840.GE248138@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robin@protonic.nl \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=yibin.gong@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).