From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Jordan Hand" <jorhand@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Tadeusz Struk" <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>,
"Piotr Król" <piotr.krol@3mdeb.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: TPM 2.0 Linux sysfs interface
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:30:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567596658.4937.40.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904055829.GA3936@ziepe.ca>
On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 02:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:29:43PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > This discussion is going around in circles. There are enough people
> > asking that the kernel provide at least the TPM version (eg. TPM 1.2
> > or TPM 2.0). Userspace applications/regression tests shouldn't have
> > to figure out the TPM version by sending a TPM command and seeing if
> > it fails. That really isn't asking a lot.
>
> A single version number could be appropriate for sysfs
>
> > I would also prefer not having to be dependent on a userspace
> > application to read the TPM PCRs in order to verify the IMA
> > measurement list.
>
> Why?
Being dependent on a userspace application implies a level of trust,
that might not be warranted, depending on the system's configuration.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-26 23:24 TPM 2.0 Linux sysfs interface Piotr Król
2019-08-27 1:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-28 15:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-08-28 16:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-30 21:20 ` Tadeusz Struk
2019-09-02 19:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-02 21:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-09-03 5:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-03 11:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-09-03 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-03 13:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-09-03 16:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-03 16:23 ` Tadeusz Struk
2019-09-03 22:40 ` Jordan Hand
2019-09-03 23:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-09-04 5:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-04 11:30 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-09-04 19:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-04 20:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-09-06 17:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2019-08-28 15:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-08-28 17:15 ` Petr Vorel
2019-08-28 23:22 ` Piotr Król
2019-08-29 7:32 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1567596658.4937.40.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piotr.krol@3mdeb.com \
--cc=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).