From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88C2C10F14 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8AC21A4C for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725875AbfJBWE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:58 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:7736 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726364AbfJBWE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x92M2IgL128986 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vd2c8bag1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:04:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:04:54 +0100 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:04:48 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x92M4kCn46792984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:46 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6805BA4053; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9A0A4055; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-196.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.196]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() non static From: Mimi Zohar To: Nayna Jain , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Matthew Garret , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Claudio Carvalho , George Wilson , Elaine Palmer , Eric Ricther , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Prakhar Srivastava Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:04:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-7-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> <1569594360-7141-7-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19100222-4275-0000-0000-0000036D75ED X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19100222-4276-0000-0000-000038807A43 Message-Id: <1570053883.4421.77.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=928 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910020175 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing Prakhar] On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 10:25 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote: > To add the support for checking against blacklist, it would be needed > to add an additional measurement record that identifies the record > as blacklisted. > > This patch modifies the process_buffer_measurement() and makes it > non static to be used by blacklist functionality. It modifies the > function to handle more than just the KEXEC_CMDLINE. > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain Making process_buffer_measurement() non static is the end result, not the reason for the change.  The reason for changing process_buffer_measurement() is to make it more generic.  The blacklist measurement record is the usecase. Please rewrite the patch description. thanks, Mimi