linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix incorrect success returns from tpm_try_transmit()
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 14:59:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190103125904.GA10491@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546280851.3079.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:27:31AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> Ever since 627448e85c766 "tpm: separate cmd_ready/go_idle from
> runtime_pm" we have been returning success from tpm_try_transmit()
> even if an error occurred.  The reason is that the introduction of rc
> = tpm_go_idle() at the end of processing overwrites the value of rc if
> it contains an error code (mostly with success).  Fix this by writing
> the return to a new variable rc1 instead.
> 
> Fixes: 627448e85c766 "tpm: separate cmd_ready/go_idle from runtime_pm"
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Note: the goto out looks fishy as well.  The only go_idle implementor
> is tpm_crb and that can return a timeout as -ETIME, so it looks like it
> would then loop forever
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> index 129f640424b7..ac7ebab6140c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>  				unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_output_header *header = (void *)buf;
> -	int rc;
> +	int rc, rc1;
>  	ssize_t len = 0;
>  	u32 count, ordinal;
>  	unsigned long stop;
> @@ -547,8 +547,8 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>  		dev_err(&chip->dev, "tpm2_commit_space: error %d\n", rc);
>  
>  out:
> -	rc = tpm_go_idle(chip, flags);
> -	if (rc)
> +	rc1 = tpm_go_idle(chip, flags);
> +	if (rc1)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	if (need_locality)

Thanks James and sorry for latency (holiday season). Just a small
suggestion. I would just:

if (tpm_go_idle(chip, flags))
	goto out;

What do you think?

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-03 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-31 18:27 [PATCH] tpm: fix incorrect success returns from tpm_try_transmit() James Bottomley
2019-01-03 12:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-01-03 13:37   ` Winkler, Tomas
2019-01-03 15:03     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 15:23   ` James Bottomley
2019-01-03 15:34     ` Winkler, Tomas
2019-01-03 16:17       ` James Bottomley
2019-01-10 17:16         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 17:16       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190103125904.GA10491@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).