From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Cc: grawity@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:59:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322155917.GA6987@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155326553839.17270.7997105682830234546.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:38:58AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> The poll condition should only check response_length,
> because reads should only be issued if there is data to read.
> The response_read flag only prevents double writes.
> The problem was that the write set the response_read to false,
> enqued a tpm job, and returned. Then application called poll
> which checked the response_read flag and returned EPOLLIN.
> Then the application called read, but got nothing.
> After all that the async_work kicked in.
> Added also mutex_lock around the poll check to prevent
> other possible race conditions.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 9488585b21bef0df12 ("tpm: add support for partial reads")
> Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Thank you.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 14:38 [PATCH RESEND v3] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll Tadeusz Struk
2019-03-22 15:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-03-25 14:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-26 15:58 ` Tadeusz Struk
2019-03-27 4:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190322155917.GA6987@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=grawity@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).