linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: "David Gstir" <david@sigma-star.at>,
	"Aymen Sghaier" <aymen.sghaier@nxp.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Jan Luebbe" <j.luebbe@pengutronix.de>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	"Steffen Trumtrar" <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Udit Agarwal" <udit.agarwal@nxp.com>,
	"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"Horia Geantă" <horia.geanta@nxp.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	"James Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Franck LENORMAND" <franck.lenormand@nxp.com>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:34:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b5b1722-7934-045e-1807-075278041ae7@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU2q_KCi8nNv56s0ip7CZaAE=YgObwFUyzuGa_T1Ywp-wQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 24.08.21 17:23, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:33 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 23.08.21 19:50, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:29 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>>> On 20.08.21 23:19, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:36 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>>>>> On 20.08.21 22:20, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>>> It works for a user keyring but not a session keyring... does that
>>>>> explain anything?
>>>>> # keyctl add trusted mykey 'new 32' @u
>>>>> 941210782
>>>>> # keyctl print 941210782
>>>>> 83b7845cb45216496aead9ee2c6a406f587d64aad47bddc539d8947a247e618798d9306b36398b5dc2722a4c3f220a3a763ee175f6bd64758fdd49ca4db597e8ce328121b60edbba9b8d8d55056be896
>>>>> # keyctl add trusted mykey 'new 32' @s
>>>>> 310571960
>>>>> # keyctl print 310571960
>>>>> keyctl_read_alloc: Unknown error 126
>>>>
>>>> Both sequences work for me.
>>>>
>>>> My getty is started by systemd. I think systemd allocates a new session
>>>> keyring for the getty that's inherited by the shell and the commands I run
>>>> it in. If you don't do that, each command will get its own session key.
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I'm still trying to wrap my head around the differences in
>>>>> keyrings and trusted vs user keys.
>>>>
>>>> No problem. HTH.
>>>
>>> Ahmad,
>>>
>>> Ok that explains it - my testing is using a very basic buildroot
>>> ramdisk rootfs. If I do a 'keyctl new_session' first I can use the
>>> system keyring fine as well.
>>
>> Great. Does this mean I can get your Tested-by: ? :)
>>
> 
> Absolutely,
> 
> For the series:
> 
> I tested this series on top of v5.14.rc-7 on a Gateworks
> imx8mm-venice-gw73xx board with kernel param trusted.source=caam and
> keyutils-1.6:
> # keyctl new_session
> 22544757
> # keyctl add trusted mykey 'new 32' @s
> 160701809
> # keyctl print 160701809
> 990e03aa4515aee420eede17e26a58d0c5568c8bd2c9c2ee2f22a0583181d20d4f65cf9cb1f944a3cc92c0e3184a44a29a7e511f0a55a6af11a70ac2b2924514002475e73ae09820042896b9ee00a5ec
> 
> Tested-By: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>

Thanks. I'll apply it to the whole series then.

> One more question: I've got a user that wants to blob/deblob generic
> data. They can use the caam_encap_blob/caam_decap_blob functions in
> kernel code but could you give me a suggestion for how they could use
> this in:
> a) userspace code (using the keyctl syscall I assume)
> b) userspace cmdline (via keyutils I assume)

Trusted keys aren't disclosed to userspace in plain text, only in sealed
form (bar vulnerabilities of course).

Cheers,
Ahmad

> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Tim
> 


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 16:48 [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys Ahmad Fatoum
2021-07-21 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] KEYS: trusted: allow users to use kernel RNG for key material Ahmad Fatoum
2021-07-22  6:17   ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-21 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] KEYS: trusted: allow trust sources " Ahmad Fatoum
2021-07-22  6:31   ` Sumit Garg
2021-08-09  7:52     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-09  9:56       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-10  5:24         ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-21 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] crypto: caam - add in-kernel interface for blob generator Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-10 11:29   ` David Gstir
2021-08-11 10:22     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-11 10:43       ` David Gstir
2021-07-21 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-06 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-09  9:35   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-09 10:16     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-10 11:28       ` David Gstir
2021-08-20 16:25         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-20 15:39 ` Tim Harvey
2021-08-20 16:19   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-20 20:20     ` Tim Harvey
2021-08-20 20:36       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-20 21:19         ` Tim Harvey
2021-08-23 13:29           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-23 17:50             ` Tim Harvey
2021-08-24  7:33               ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-08-24 15:23                 ` Tim Harvey
2021-08-25  9:34                   ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b5b1722-7934-045e-1807-075278041ae7@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=aymen.sghaier@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=franck.lenormand@nxp.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
    --cc=j.luebbe@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    --cc=udit.agarwal@nxp.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).