From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD3DC43381 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A5965165 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229544AbhCIJKt (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 04:10:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229599AbhCIJKV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 04:10:21 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AECA1C061760 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id e7so25895594lft.2 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:10:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wKD+yQjGrl7OUNRHRyxFsQZJDZyYo41ddQeYWHD+EP0=; b=HTohe6xlqSsa9ysdqGaDx/LKiLgeY77hqdlLI5nZOMc7bJyltab5PD7dPzX7NKciVI CiR0s2nUBmoC8xS7Fx4FxibTJ6bZfsYvhj45Fgg3+IADOfkL5vNu6q4PmCDEYnN4eGiW MVh2GdGnAqFUnHDgWXCDI/GUauwAnCR8CqsK+Y5A1lu3sqYOd1P63aWs0Sw6kQRAlQ/J sWj1qF4z5PALe45obJIuGKem1TrGlbvLr2Lvd6d2kEnUqnjaIjdQeR3PBK9qMETa/XGv w1WiD1gwAN6H+FW6uZfkVLEnlnB+w9D61pMvCAVVj5ZrgusV7trTi5Pt3J0lrw8Igz5m MzVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wKD+yQjGrl7OUNRHRyxFsQZJDZyYo41ddQeYWHD+EP0=; b=pJxqhnfzYmPBbX9iighBixR0x+JCZpHx9bJi/8XPVOO6pSgbKh6bz8SDw9TSeKcrHc eW2dX28rd7X5A/rViNriBpN52N0vr1F62FYKfz8xIdKkeFh93VePplid+Cgrq6RtAFot F1W6CglejTyaVHpenH/YiUR0pgtiZhiyJzUhNw7f9F48o0fOpx646d0Xzk6J3qMd3TZw JD8yuQgNdxCYd8XQwgJbkut8OUq5QTWNJEdSH4I2naIwEcpEnK973N/CTPq1TguTtdAm M7WwEnsbvO9L58z4+IXe6h1m+0tZEqE8uySyFlSPvGiA7rueU5L/DdAhoGtsFTovNbZS qNlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ds+gJy2KtPtdbSMWVemmrDaSNdo83sKMy4pJt1eMdU7QbrWx2 efk7/beZ5JETlCWJ0fbMlV47ERyMLMgdpmjnFNkJlQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsYPinGD4rPMc2OYJcBuXtSZFtl07YktW+xNb1utv1lOShAxTn8gj6iLPahmv3R1yl8oBj1yKfBXITAAXQeCU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46db:: with SMTP id p27mr16853964lfo.396.1615281018970; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:10:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210301131127.793707-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Sumit Garg Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:40:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , Mimi Zohar , James Bottomley , David Howells , Jens Wiklander , Jonathan Corbet , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Casey Schaufler , Janne Karhunen , Daniel Thompson , Markus Wamser , Luke Hinds , Elaine Palmer , Ahmad Fatoum , "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 21:14, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:30:18PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Jarkko, > > > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 18:41, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality > > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is > > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device. > > > > > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already > > > merged in upstream [1]. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/commit/f86ab8e7e0de869dfa25ca05a37ee070d7e5b86b > > > > > > Changes in v9: > > > 1. Rebased to latest tpmdd/master. > > > 2. Defined pr_fmt() and removed redundant tags. > > > 3. Patch #2: incorporated misc. comments. > > > 4. Patch #3: incorporated doc changes from Elaine and misc. comments > > > from Randy. > > > 5. Patch #4: reverted to separate maintainer entry as per request from > > > Jarkko. > > > 6. Added Jarkko's Tested-by: tag on patch #2. > > > > It looks like we don't have any further comments on this patch-set. So > > would you be able to pick up this patch-set? > > I'm cool with that - I can pick this for 5.13. > Thanks. -Sumit > /Jarkko