linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
	Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KEYS: asymmetric: enforce that sig algo matches key algo
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 19:22:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfn5AFaH6mMa6FB3@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfn2KZgjuFRSJzSj@sol.localdomain>

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 07:10:33PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > This seem incorrect too, as sig->pkey_algo could be NULL for direct
> > signature verification calls. For example, for keyctl pkey_verify.
> 
> We can make it optional if some callers aren't providing it.  Of course, such
> callers wouldn't be able to verify ECDSA signatures.

Sorry, I got that backwards.  ECDSA signatures don't specify the curve, but the
keys do (as I noted in a comment).  So ECDSA wouldn't require sig->pkey_algo.

Since it appears that KEYCTL_PKEY_VERIFY does in fact have no way to specify a
pkey_algo, I'll allow NULL pkey_algo in v2.

Note that SM2 isn't implemented correctly when sig->pkey_algo is NULL, as the
following code incorrectly uses the signature's pkey_algo rather than the key's:

        if (sig->pkey_algo && strcmp(sig->pkey_algo, "sm2") == 0 &&
            sig->data_size) {
                ret = cert_sig_digest_update(sig, tfm);
                if (ret)
                        goto error_free_key;
        }

I'm not sure whether I should even bother fixing that, given how broken the SM2
stuff is anyway.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01  0:34 [PATCH 0/2] Fix bugs in public_key_verify_signature() Eric Biggers
2022-02-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] KEYS: asymmetric: enforce that sig algo matches key algo Eric Biggers
2022-02-02  2:52   ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-02  3:10     ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-02  3:22       ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-02-02  5:20       ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-21  1:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04 19:26     ` Eric Biggers
2022-03-05  5:51       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: asymmetric: properly validate hash_algo and encoding Eric Biggers
2022-02-21  1:46   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-21  2:21     ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-21 20:16       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-01  2:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix bugs in public_key_verify_signature() Stefan Berger
2022-02-07  7:45 ` Tianjia Zhang
2022-02-07 11:43 ` [PATCH] KEYS: asymmetric: enforce SM2 signature use pkey algo Tianjia Zhang
2022-02-08  5:35   ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-08  9:45     ` Tianjia Zhang
2022-02-21  1:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-21  2:43     ` Tianjia Zhang
2022-02-21 20:17       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yfn5AFaH6mMa6FB3@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=vt@altlinux.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).