From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Safford, David (GE Global Research)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:06:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208220025.GB13567@linux.intel.com>
On 2/8/19 5:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:21:02PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> I still think that in 5/5 branching could be better but is not a biggie
> for me (does not make the implementation as whole any kind of mess) and
> since it is now peer tested I rather would not modify it right now.
>
> Applied to master and next!
5/5 may cause a complaint about the scanf'ing of a single value in an
existing line. Let's see...
Thanks.
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 22:10 [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-09 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] tpm: ppi: pass function revision ID to tpm_eval_dsm() Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] tpm: ppi: Display up to 101 operations as define for version 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] tpm: ppi: Possibly show command parameter if TPM PPI 1.3 is used Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-16 21:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] tpm: ppi: Enable submission of optional command parameter for PPI 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-16 21:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-11 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3 Safford, David (GE Global Research)
2019-01-14 19:51 ` Stefan Berger
2019-01-18 15:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 21:21 ` Stefan Berger
2019-02-08 22:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 22:06 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david.safford@ge.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).