From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jroedel@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] iommu/amd: Check for busy devices earlier in attach_device()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:37:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926063701.drppvoo6nztxtbjq@cantor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925132300.3038-5-joro@8bytes.org>
On Wed Sep 25 19, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
>Check early in attach_device whether the device is already attached to a
>domain. This also simplifies the code path so that __attach_device() can
>be removed.
>
>Fixes: 92d420ec028d ("iommu/amd: Relax locking in dma_ops path")
>Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>---
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 25 +++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
>index 2919168577ff..459247c32dc0 100644
>--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
>+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
>@@ -2072,23 +2072,6 @@ static void do_detach(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data)
> domain->dev_cnt -= 1;
> }
>
>-/*
>- * If a device is not yet associated with a domain, this function makes the
>- * device visible in the domain
>- */
>-static int __attach_device(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
>- struct protection_domain *domain)
>-{
>- if (dev_data->domain != NULL)
>- return -EBUSY;
>-
>- /* Attach alias group root */
>- do_attach(dev_data, domain);
>-
>- return 0;
>-}
>-
>-
> static void pdev_iommuv2_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> pci_disable_ats(pdev);
>@@ -2174,6 +2157,10 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
>
> dev_data = get_dev_data(dev);
>
>+ ret = -EBUSY;
>+ if (dev_data->domain != NULL)
>+ goto out;
>+
> if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> goto skip_ats_check;
>
>@@ -2198,7 +2185,9 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> skip_ats_check:
>- ret = __attach_device(dev_data, domain);
>+ ret = 0;
>+
>+ do_attach(dev_data, domain);
>
> /*
> * We might boot into a crash-kernel here. The crashed kernel
>--
>2.17.1
>
>_______________________________________________
>iommu mailing list
>iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 13:22 [PATCH 0/6] iommu/amd: Locking Fixes Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] iommu/amd: Remove domain->updated Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:45 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:18 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-25 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Remove amd_iommu_devtable_lock Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:50 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-25 15:52 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:24 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-25 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] iommu/amd: Take domain->lock for complete attach/detach path Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:53 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:34 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-25 13:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] iommu/amd: Check for busy devices earlier in attach_device() Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:55 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:37 ` Jerry Snitselaar [this message]
2019-09-25 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] iommu/amd: Lock dev_data in attach/detach code paths Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:56 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:41 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-25 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] iommu/amd: Lock code paths traversing protection_domain->dev_list Joerg Roedel
2019-09-25 15:58 ` Sironi, Filippo via iommu
2019-09-26 6:48 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-26 0:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] iommu/amd: Locking Fixes Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-26 5:46 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190926063701.drppvoo6nztxtbjq@cantor \
--to=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=sironi@amazon.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).