Re: [PATCH] iommu/mediatek: Move the tlb_sync into tlb_flush

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	cui.zhang@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	chao.hao@mediatek.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/mediatek: Move the tlb_sync into tlb_flush
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:09:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190930120926.t26ydhgggi2scg3e@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569822142-14303-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:42:22PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> The commit 4d689b619445 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Convert to IOMMU API
> TLB sync") help move the tlb_sync of unmap from v7s into the iommu
> framework. It helps add a new function "mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync", But it
> lacked the dom->pgtlock, then it will cause the variable
> "tlb_flush_active" may be changed unexpectedly, we could see this warning
> log randomly:
> 
> mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: Partial TLB flush timed out, falling back to
> full flush
> 
> To fix this issue, we can add dom->pgtlock in the "mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync".
> And when checking this issue, we find that __arm_v7s_unmap call
> io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush consecutively when it is supersection/largepage,
> this also is potential unsafe for us. There is no tlb flush queue in the
> MediaTek M4U HW. The HW always expect the tlb_flush/tlb_sync one by one.
> If v7s don't always gurarantee the sequence, Thus, In this patch I move
> the tlb_sync into tlb_flush(also rename the function deleting "_nosync").
> and we don't care if it is leaf, rearrange the callback functions. Also,
> the tlb flush/sync was already finished in v7s, then iotlb_sync and
> iotlb_sync_all is unnecessary.
> 
> Besides, there are two minor changes:
> a) Use writel for the register F_MMU_INV_RANGE which is for triggering the
> HW work. We expect all the setting(iova_start/iova_end...) have already
> been finished before F_MMU_INV_RANGE.
> b) Reduce the tlb timeout value from 100000us to 1000us. the original value
> is so long that affect the multimedia performance.
> 
> Fixes: 4d689b619445 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync")
> Signed-off-by: Chao Hao <chao.hao@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> This patch looks break the logic for tlb_flush and tlb_sync. I'm not
> sure if it
> is reasonable. If someone has concern, I could change:
> a) Add dom->pgtlock in the mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync
> b) Add a io_pgtable_tlb_sync in [1].

The patch looks ok to me, but please could you split it up so that the
timeout and writel are done separately?

Thanks,

Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu