iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: add a dma_ops_bypass flag to struct device
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:37:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200325083740.GC21605@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41975da3-3a4a-fc3c-2b90-8d607cf220e6@ozlabs.ru>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:51:36PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> This is for persistent memory which you can DMA to/from but yet it does
> >> not appear in the system as a normal memory and therefore requires
> >> special handling anyway (O_DIRECT or DAX, I do not know the exact
> >> mechanics). All other devices in the system should just run as usual,
> >> i.e. use 1:1 mapping if possible.
> > 
> > On other systems (x86 and arm) pmem as long as it is page backed does
> > not require any special handling.  This must be some weird way powerpc
> > fucked up again, and I suspect you'll have to suffer from it.
> 
> 
> It does not matter if it is backed by pages or not, the problem may also
> appear if we wanted for example p2p PCI via IOMMU (between PHBs) and
> MMIO might be mapped way too high in the system address space and make
> 1:1 impossible.

How can it be mapped too high for a direct mapping with a 64-bit DMA
mask?
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 14:16 generic DMA bypass flag v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: add a dma_ops_bypass flag to struct device Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20 15:02   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-23  1:28   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-23  8:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23  8:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 15:37         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-03-23 17:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-24  3:05             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-24  6:30               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-03-24  7:55                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-24  7:54               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25  4:51                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-25  8:37                   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-03-26  1:26                     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-04-03  8:38                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-04-06 11:50                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 13:25                           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-04-06 17:17                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-07 10:12                               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-04-14  6:21                                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-04-14  6:30                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23  8:58       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-23 17:20         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-24  3:37           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-24  4:55             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-03-24  7:52             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 12:14   ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-23 12:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: use the generic dma_ops_bypass mode Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-13 13:37 generic DMA bypass flag Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: add a dma_ops_bypass flag to struct device Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200325083740.GC21605@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).