iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Remove functions that support private domain
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:56:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514195615.GP18353@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F573A651E@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:44:16PM +0000, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote:
> Could you please explain why we shouldn't change default-domain for an
> iommu group that has multiple devices?

Because you can't be sure that a device is bound to a driver while the
default domain of the group is changed. As long as this race condition
exists we can't change the default domains of groups with multiple
devices at runtime.

> I am asking this particularly because the patch set I am working on
> allows to change default-domain for an iommu group that has multiple
> devices. The pre-requisite being that all the devices in the group
> should already be unbounded from the device driver and the
> default-domain preferences of all the devices in the group shouldn't
> have conflicting types i.e. some devices cannot say they *only* need
> identity domain while other devices in the same group say that they
> *only* need to be in DMA domain. In this case, we will not be able to
> decide upon a default-domain for the iommu group.

Yeah, but as I wrote above, this is racy and there is currently no way
to fix that. So we can't support it.


Regards,

	Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 22:47 [PATCH] iommu: Remove functions that support private domain Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-05-14 13:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-14 17:51   ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-14 18:32     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-14 18:44       ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-14 19:56         ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-14 23:12           ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-15  9:59             ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-15 12:55               ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-15 15:46                 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-17  8:29                   ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-25 13:56                     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-28 19:31                       ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-15 18:35               ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-05-15 10:01 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200514195615.GP18353@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).