iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Warn on out-of-range invalidation address
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630103459.6c99c961@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d87d15fd-71d5-6735-74df-583024826ab0@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:10:43 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > For guest requested IOTLB invalidation, address and mask are
> > provided as part of the invalidation data. VT-d HW silently ignores
> > any address bits below the mask. SW shall also allow such case but
> > give warning if address does not align with the mask. This patch
> > relax the fault handling from error to warning and proceed with
> > invalidation request with the given mask.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 +++----
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c index 5ea5732d5ec4..50fc62413a35
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -5439,13 +5439,12 @@ intel_iommu_sva_invalidate(struct
> > iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, 
> >   		switch (BIT(cache_type)) {
> >   		case IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB:
> > +			/* HW will ignore LSB bits based on
> > address mask */ if (inv_info->granularity == IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR &&
> >   			    size &&
> >   			    (inv_info->addr_info.addr &
> > ((BIT(VTD_PAGE_SHIFT + size)) - 1))) {
> > -				pr_err_ratelimited("Address out of
> > range, 0x%llx, size order %llu\n",
> > -
> > inv_info->addr_info.addr, size);
> > -				ret = -ERANGE;
> > -				goto out_unlock;
> > +				WARN_ONCE(1, "Address out of
> > range, 0x%llx, size order %llu\n",
> > +
> > inv_info->addr_info.addr, size);  
> 
> I don't think WARN_ONCE() is suitable here. It makes users think it's
> a kernel bug. How about pr_warn_ratelimited()?
> 
I think pr_warn_ratelimited might still be too chatty. There is no
functional issues, we just don't to silently ignore it. Perhaps just
say:
WARN_ONCE(1, "User provided address not page aligned, alignment forced")
?

> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
> >   			}
> >   
> >   			/*
> >   

[Jacob Pan]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 15:43 [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Misc tweaks and fixes for vSVA Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Enforce PASID devTLB field mask Jacob Pan
2020-06-25  7:14   ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove global page support in devTLB flush Jacob Pan
2020-06-25  7:17   ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID devTLB invalidation Jacob Pan
2020-06-25  7:25   ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30  3:01     ` Tian, Kevin
2020-06-30  4:58       ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-30  4:57     ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle non-page aligned address Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 10:05   ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30 17:19     ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix devTLB flush for vSVA Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 20:12   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-24  0:38   ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Warn on out-of-range invalidation address Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 10:10   ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30 17:34     ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2020-07-01  1:45       ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-01 14:19         ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Disable multiple GPASID-dev bind Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 12:54   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630103459.6c99c961@jacob-builder \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).