iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: "kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Boeuf, Sebastien" <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>,
	Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>,
	Yinghan Yang <Yinghan.Yang@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:27:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210202202713.GF702808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBkYsSHGUfG91NoN@myrica>

On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf
> > > You can incorporate it into the ASWG proposal.
> > > Changes since v8:
> > > * One typo (s/programing/programming/)
> > > * Modified the PCI Range node to include a segment range.
> > > 
> > > I also updated the Linux and QEMU implementations on branch
> > > virtio-iommu/devel in https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ and
> > > https://jpbrucker.net/git/qemu/
> > > 
> > > Thanks again for helping with this
> > > 
> > > Jean
> > 
> > Perfect.  Thanks.  I'll update the ASWG info right away.
> 
> Has there been any more feedback on the VIOT specification? I'm wondering
> when we can start upstreaming support for it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jean

Ah, sorry, Jean.  I meant to get back to you sooner.  My apologies.

The latest version that resulted from the discussion with Yinghan of
Microsoft is the one in front the ASWG; I think if you upstream that
version, it should be identical to the spec when it is next published
(post ACPI 6.4).

The process is: (1) propose the change, (2) review it in committee,
(3) give people more time to think about it, then (4) have a finale
vote.  We've been iterating over (1), (2) and (3).  Since there was
no new discussion at the last meeting, we should have the final vote
on this (4) in the next meeting.  I had hoped we could do that last
week but the meeting was canceled at the last minute.  I hope to have
the final vote this Thursday and will let you know as soon as it has
been decided.

My apologies for the delays; getting things done by committee always
takes a bazillion times longer than one would think.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@redhat.com
-----------------------------------

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05  0:13 Question regarding VIOT proposal Yinghan Yang via iommu
2020-11-05 13:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-11-05 22:05   ` [EXTERNAL] " Yinghan Yang via iommu
2020-11-06 13:57     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-12-03 22:21       ` Yinghan Yang via iommu
2020-12-03 23:01         ` Al Stone
2020-12-04 18:09           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-12-04 18:15             ` Yinghan Yang via iommu
2020-12-04 20:18             ` Al Stone
2021-02-02  9:17               ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-02 20:27                 ` Al Stone [this message]
2021-02-03  8:46                   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-04 20:25                     ` Al Stone
2021-02-16 21:31                       ` Al Stone
2021-02-17  9:37                         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-18 23:39                           ` Al Stone
2021-02-19 11:24                             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-19 17:35                               ` Al Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210202202713.GF702808@redhat.com \
    --to=ahs3@redhat.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
    --cc=Yinghan.Yang@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sebastien.boeuf@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).