iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:49:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22759c43f440eecee60b2d318b6f8e8fe2587bcb.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122030449.28892-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2599 bytes --]

On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 11:04 +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Intel VT-d 3.0 introduces more caches and interfaces for software to
> flush when it runs in the scalable mode. Currently various cache flush
> helpers are scattered around. This consolidates them by putting them in
> the existing iommu_flush structure.
> 
> /* struct iommu_flush - Intel IOMMU cache invalidation ops
>  *
>  * @cc_inv: invalidate context cache
>  * @iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches when software
>  *             has changed second-level tables.
>  * @p_iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches when software
>  *               has changed first-level tables.
>  * @pc_inv: invalidate pasid cache
>  * @dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by requests-without-PASID
>  *               from the Device-TLB on a endpoint device.
>  * @p_dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by requests-with-PASID
>  *                 from the Device-TLB on an endpoint device
>  */
> struct iommu_flush {
>         void (*cc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
>                        u16 sid, u8 fm, u64 type);
>         void (*iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 addr,
>                           unsigned int size_order, u64 type);
>         void (*p_iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32 pasid,
>                             u64 addr, unsigned long npages, bool ih);
>         void (*pc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32 pasid,
>                        u64 granu);
>         void (*dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
>                             u16 qdep, u64 addr, unsigned int mask);
>         void (*p_dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
>                               u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
>                               unsigned long npages);
> };
> 
> The name of each cache flush ops is defined according to the spec section 6.5
> so that people are easy to look up them in the spec.

Hm, indirect function calls are quite expensive these days.

I would have preferred to go in the opposite direction, since surely
aren't going to have *many* of these implementations. Currently there's
only one for register-based and one for queued invalidation, right?
Even if VT-d 3.0 throws an extra version in, I think I'd prefer to take
out the indirection completely and have an if/then helper.

Would love to see a microbenchmark of unmap operations before and after
this patch series with retpoline enabled, to see the effect.




[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5174 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-03  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-22  3:04 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/vt-d: Extend iommu_flush for scalable mode Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate device tlb invalidation Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid-based " Lu Baolu
2019-12-03 17:43   ` Jacob Pan
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid-based device " Lu Baolu
2019-12-02 20:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops Jacob Pan
2019-12-03  2:44   ` Lu Baolu
2019-12-03 16:50     ` Jacob Pan
2019-12-04  0:32       ` Lu Baolu
2019-12-04 17:41         ` Jacob Pan
2019-12-03  8:49 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2019-12-04  0:27   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22759c43f440eecee60b2d318b6f8e8fe2587bcb.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).