From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: janani@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linuxppc-dev
<linuxppc-dev-bounces+janani=linux.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:00:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e8jnk5a.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3dc137a99c73b1b6582fc854844a417e@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello Janani,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
janani <janani@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On 2019-07-12 23:45, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> powerpc is also going to use this feature, so put it in a generic location.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>> arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +---
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
>> index c47b328eada0..4ef3499d4480 100644
>> --- a/arch/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
>> @@ -927,6 +927,9 @@ config LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS
>> the chance of application behavior change because of timing
>> differences. The counts are reported via debugfs.
>>
>> +config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> + bool
>> +
>> source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
>>
>> source "scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig"
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> index 5d8570ed6cab..f820e631bf89 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,4 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> -config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> - def_bool y
>> -
>
> Since you are removing the "def_bool y" when ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT is moved to
> arch/Kconfig, does the s390/Kconfig need "select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT" added
> like you do for x86/Kconfig?
Indeed, I missed that. Thanks for spotting it!
>
> - Janani
>
>> config MMU
>> def_bool y
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index c9f331bb538b..5d3295f2df94 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ config X86
>> select ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE
>> select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
>> select ARCH_HAS_KCOV if X86_64
>> + select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE
>> select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
>> select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
>> @@ -1520,9 +1521,6 @@ config X86_CPA_STATISTICS
>> helps to determine the effectiveness of preserving large and huge
>> page mappings when mapping protections are changed.
>>
>> -config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> - def_bool y
>> -
>> config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> bool "AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support"
>> depends on X86_64 && CPU_SUP_AMD
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-13 4:45 [PATCH 0/3] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-13 4:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-13 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86,s390: " Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-15 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, s390: " janani
2019-07-15 20:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2019-07-13 4:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-13 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-13 4:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-13 5:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877e8jnk5a.fsf@morokweng.localdomain \
--to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=janani@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-bounces+janani=linux.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).