From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] IOMMU fix for 5.10 (-final)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:17:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg370+69ZoXFdUABwwqNaej3hrjcqAsb56J++h2oXKJpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tusulrog.fsf@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:12 AM Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Since the field in the device table entry format expects it to be n
> where there are 2^n entries in the table I guess it should be:
>
> #define DTE_IRQ_TABLE_LEN 9
> #define MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE (1 << DTE_IRQ_TABLE_LEN)
No, that "DTE_IRQ_TABLE_LEN" is not the size shift - it's the size
shift value in that DTE field, which is shifted up by 1.
That's why the current code does that
#define DTE_IRQ_TABLE_LEN (9ULL << 1)
there..
Which was why I suggested that new #define that is the *actual* shift
value, and then the DTE thing and the MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE values would
depend on that.
Linus
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 14:12 [GIT PULL] IOMMU fix for 5.10 (-final) Will Deacon
2020-12-09 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-12-09 18:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-09 19:12 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-09 19:15 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-09 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-12-09 19:23 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-10 11:55 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2020-12-09 18:09 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wg370+69ZoXFdUABwwqNaej3hrjcqAsb56J++h2oXKJpg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).