iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] switch m68k to use the generic remapping DMA allocator
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:26:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUNwERTRg4MbkkD62EtNhsU7kWVy6x4kB89rYh6ann0Pw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625063228.GA29561@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 08:53:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > > can you take a look at the (untested) patches below?  They convert m68k
> > > to use the generic remapping DMA allocator, which is also used by
> > > arm64 and csky.
> >
> > Thanks. But what does this buy us?
>
> A common dma mapping code base with everyone, including supporting
> DMA allocations from atomic context, which the documentation and
> API assume are there, but which don't work on m68k.

OK, thanks!

> > bloat-o-meter says:
> >
> > add/remove: 75/0 grow/shrink: 11/6 up/down: 4122/-82 (4040)
>
> What do these values stand for?  The code should grow a little as
> we now need to include the the pool allocator for the above API
> fix.

Last 3 values are "bytes added/removed (net increase)".
So this increases the static kernel size by ca. 4 KiB.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 10:21 [RFC] switch m68k to use the generic remapping DMA allocator Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] m68k: use the generic dma coherent remap allocator Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] m68k: implement arch_dma_prep_coherent Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17 13:39 ` [RFC] switch m68k to use the generic remapping DMA allocator Greg Ungerer
2019-06-17 18:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-25  6:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25  7:26     ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-06-25  7:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25  8:07         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-24  7:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-25  6:33   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUNwERTRg4MbkkD62EtNhsU7kWVy6x4kB89rYh6ann0Pw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).