On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:30:54AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> > On 02.06.21 19:24, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > >> If I understand this correctly, /dev/ioasid is a kind of "common
> > supplier"
> > >> to other APIs / devices. Why can't the fd be acquired by the
> > >> consumer APIs (eg. kvm, vfio, etc) ?
> > >
> > > /dev/ioasid would be similar to /dev/vfio, and everything already
> > > deals with exposing /dev/vfio and /dev/vfio/N together
> > >
> > > I don't see it as a problem, just more work.
> > 
> > One of the problems I'm seeing is in container environments: when
> > passing in an vfio device, we now also need to pass in /dev/ioasid,
> > thus increasing the complexity in container setup (or orchestration).
> 
> Containers already needed to do this today. Container orchestration is
> hard.

Right to use VFIO a container already needs both /dev/vfio and one or
more /dev/vfio/NNN group devices.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson