From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
kevin.tian@intel.com, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:23:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8a37837-30d0-d7cc-496a-df4c12fff1da@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002182348.GO138842@redhat.com>
Hello Al,
On 10/2/20 8:23 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 24 Sep 2020 11:54, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Adding Al in the loop
>>
>> On 9/24/20 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak
>>>>> suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this?
>>>>
>>>> My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open:
>>>>
>>>> 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I
>>>> think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads
>>>> to the real question:
>>>
>>> I am not sure it's a must.
>>> We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences
>>> between ACPI and virtio formats.
>>>
>>> But we do want the virtio format used here to be approved by the virtio
>>> TC, so it won't change.
>>>
>>> Eric, Jean-Philippe, does one of you intend to create a github issue
>>> and request a ballot for the TC? It's been posted end of August with no
>>> changes ...
>> Jean-Philippe, would you?
>>>
>>>> 2) Has the ACPI table format stabalized already? If and only if
>>>> the answer is Yes I will Ack these patches. We don't need to
>>>> wait until the ACPI table format is published in a
>>>> specification update, but at least some certainty that it
>>>> will not change in incompatible ways anymore is needed.
>>>>
>>
>> Al, do you have any news about the the VIOT definition submission to
>> the UEFI ASWG?
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>
> A follow-up to my earlier post ....
>
> Hearing no objection, I've submitted the VIOT table description to
> the ASWG for consideration under what they call the "code first"
> process. The "first reading" -- a brief discussion on what the
> table is and why we would like to add it -- was held yesterday.
> No concerns have been raised as yet. Given the discussions that
> have already occurred, I don't expect any, either. I have been
> wrong at least once before, however.
>
> At this point, ASWG will revisit the request to add VIOT each
> week. If there have been no comments in the prior week, and no
> further discussion during the meeting, then a vote will be taken.
> Otherwise, there will be discussion and we try again the next
> week.
>
> The ASWG was also told that the likelihood of this definition of
> the table changing is pretty low, and that it has been thought out
> pretty well already. ASWG's consideration will therefore start
> from the assumption that it would be best _not_ to make changes.
>
> So, I'll let you know what happens next week.
Thank you very much for the updates and for your support backing the
proposal in the best delays.
Best Regards
Eric
>
>>
>>>
>>> Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must.
>>>
>>>> So what progress has been made with the ACPI table specification, is it
>>>> just a matter of time to get it approved or are there concerns?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Joerg
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 13:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/virtio: Move to drivers/iommu/virtio/ Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-04 15:29 ` Auger Eric
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] iommu/virtio: Add topology helpers Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-04 16:22 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-24 8:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] PCI: Add DMA configuration for virtual platforms Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] iommu/virtio: Add topology definitions Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-04 15:30 ` Auger Eric
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/virtio: Support topology description in config space Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-04 16:05 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-24 8:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-24 15:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25 8:12 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-25 15:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] iommu/virtio: Enable x86 support Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-08-26 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-27 8:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-04 16:24 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-24 9:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-24 9:21 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-24 9:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-24 9:54 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-29 17:28 ` Al Stone
2020-10-02 18:23 ` Al Stone
2020-10-06 15:23 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-11-03 20:09 ` Al Stone
2020-11-04 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-11-04 20:56 ` Al Stone
2020-09-24 10:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-24 10:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-09-24 10:29 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-24 11:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-24 12:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-24 12:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-25 10:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-25 8:48 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-25 10:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-25 11:26 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-25 13:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-25 14:14 ` [virtio-dev] " Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8a37837-30d0-d7cc-496a-df4c12fff1da@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastien.boeuf@intel.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).