linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
To: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] checkpatch.pl investigation: NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF issues
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:32:23 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009230925520.6068@felia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABJPP5B9RsGXCCAHxve2hxmCSyPX3C5aO_5MU9QMtNm08cXiNg@mail.gmail.com>



On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:

> >
> > Generally, I think it is a good first proof of concept.
> > I believe you that functionality 'basically' works; again, we might
> > already want to run a full-scale evaluation on that. Just to see
> > if there are some impacts we might not be aware of yet.
> >
> > As you already wrote, we, Joe, you and me, need to figure out
> > now all the further details:
> >
> > - how can we avoid the duplicate code in checkpatch.pl and
> > get_maintainers.pl?
> >
> > - what is performance impact, especially as AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF check is not
> > triggered often, and there are many other rules in checkpatch.pl?
> >
> > - further details, such as why do we need the lk_path is the first place?
> > and many more questions of that kind.
> >
> > Feel free to sketch a first commit message and create a PATCH RFC for the
> > discussion with Joe.
> >
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> 
> Hi,
> As for the lk_path, it can be removed easily. To me too, it didn't make much
> sense since it was just a duplicate, as $root should contain the same.
> 
> But again due to some reason,
> $root in checkpatch had the value ".",
> while $lk_path in get_maintainer had the value "./"
> 
> I have no idea yet if this was a design decision or just different handling.
> 
> So, I can change the part where I referenced the mailmap file by adding
> a trailing / with $root rather than $lk_path. That should do it.
> 
> And for the duplicate code part, Joe did mention that either I could copy
> or place the read_mailmap code in a separate file and reference both
> checkpatch and get_maintainers from there.
> 
> To me, copying seems much feasible because the referenced part of the
> mailmap handling code here is very small as there are some minor
> changes.
>

Well, if you can argue copying code, it is fine. Go ahead and send out a 
RFC patch.

Regarding the mentorship, would you have time for some virtual 
face-to-face meeting to discuss the Eligibility Criteria and Mentorship 
Models?


Lukas
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-23  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 10:06 [Linux-kernel-mentees] checkpatch.pl investigation: NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF issues Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-18 10:29 ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-18 10:44   ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-21  9:07     ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-21  9:12       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-21  9:15       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-22 13:21         ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-22 18:38           ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-22 19:08             ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-23  7:32               ` Lukas Bulwahn [this message]
2020-09-23  7:38                 ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-23  7:42                   ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-25  4:18                     ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-25  7:20                       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-25  7:29                         ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-25  7:35                           ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-26 11:31                             ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-28 13:30                               ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-28 14:09                                 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-28 14:20                                   ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-09-28 15:09                                     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-28 15:06                               ` Lukas Bulwahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2009230925520.6068@felia \
    --to=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).