linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] of: Load KUnit DTB from of_core_init()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:15:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12903a61f64206be837c1f0744632f29.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230321173303.GA950598-robh@kernel.org>

Quoting Rob Herring (2023-03-21 10:33:03)
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:37:18AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_test.c b/drivers/of/of_test.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a4d70ac344ad
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_test.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * KUnit tests for OF APIs
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +
> > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test that the root node / exists.
> > + */
> > +static void dtb_root_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/"));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test that the /__symbols__ node exists.
> > + */
> > +static void dtb_symbols_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/__symbols__"));
> > +}
> 
> Many base DTs will not have this. And the kunit tests themselves 
> shouldn't need it because they should be independent of the base tree.
> 

When I try to apply an overlay it fails 

 OF: overlay: no fragments or symbols in overlay
 OF: overlay: init_overlay_changeset() failed, ret = -22
     # of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/of/overlay_test.c:18
     Expected 0 == ({ extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin[]; extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end[]; __of_overlay_apply_kunit((test), __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin, __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end); }), but
         ({ extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin[]; extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end[]; __of_overlay_apply_kunit((test), __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin, __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end); }) == -12 (0xfffffffffffffff4)
 [FAILED] of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply

Now I'm trying to hack on the fake root node to see if I can make it work.

---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 090c5d7925e4..12c44c86b8ae 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void __of_phandle_cache_inv_entry(phandle handle)
 		phandle_cache[handle_hash] = NULL;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF_KUNIT
+#if 0
 static int __init of_kunit_add_data(void)
 {
 	void *kunit_fdt;
diff --git a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
index 6e70e2f8cd90..e3ced1467dd9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
+++ b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 /dts-v1/;
 /plugin/;
 
-&kunit_bus {
+/ {
 	test-kunit {
 		compatible = "test,kunit-empty";
 	};
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_test.c b/drivers/of/of_test.c
index 543fdf0936f6..08b670aee083 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_test.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_test.c
@@ -15,17 +15,8 @@ static void dtb_root_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/"));
 }
 
-/*
- * Test that the /__symbols__ node exists.
- */
-static void dtb_symbols_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
-{
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/__symbols__"));
-}
-
 static struct kunit_case dtb_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(dtb_root_node_exists),
-	KUNIT_CASE(dtb_symbols_node_exists),
 	{}
 };

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15 18:37 [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] of: Load KUnit DTB from of_core_init() Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 17:33   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-21 18:15     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-03-21 18:24       ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] dt-bindings: kunit: Add fixed rate clk consumer test Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 20:14   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add KUnit clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2023-03-17  8:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data David Gow
2023-03-17  8:39 ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12903a61f64206be837c1f0744632f29.sboyd@kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).