From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: add basic KUnit test for lib/math
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:12:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201022191248.GP4077@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022191038.GO4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:10:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
...
> > > Summarize this, please create usable documentation first.
> >
> > Sounds good.
> > I'm generally wary people not reading the docs, and of documentation
> > examples becoming bitrotted faster than actual code.
> > But so far KUnit seems to be doing relatively well on both fronts.
>
> Dunno. As I told, I have created first unit test based on documentation (okay,
> I looked at the code, but you may read this as ratio was 90% doc / 10% existing
> code).
Side note: some cases are not described in doc and produced "interesting"
results that I have to look a lot into KUnit Python wrapper to fix bugs in it.
You may find my patches in the KUnit mailing list.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 22:45 [PATCH] lib: add basic KUnit test for lib/math Daniel Latypov
2020-10-20 0:45 ` kernel test robot
2020-10-20 8:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-20 16:13 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-10-21 3:40 ` David Gow
2020-10-21 17:47 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-10-22 15:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-22 16:26 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-10-22 18:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-10-22 19:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-22 19:12 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-10-22 18:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-10-22 19:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-22 21:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-10-23 9:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-02 14:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-03 1:32 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201022191248.GP4077@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).