From: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@gmail.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check flags in 'bpf_ringbuf_discard()' and 'bpf_ringbuf_submit()'
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:10:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210328161055.257504-2-pctammela@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210328161055.257504-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com>
The current code only checks flags in 'bpf_ringbuf_output()'.
Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 13 +++++++++++--
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 100cb2e4c104..232b5e5dd045 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4073,7 +4073,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Valid pointer with *size* bytes of memory available; NULL,
* otherwise.
*
- * void bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags)
+ * int bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags)
* Description
* Submit reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
@@ -4083,9 +4083,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* Return
- * Nothing. Always succeeds.
+ * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
- * void bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags)
+ * int bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags)
* Description
* Discard reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
@@ -4095,7 +4095,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* Return
- * Nothing. Always succeeds.
+ * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
* u64 bpf_ringbuf_query(void *ringbuf, u64 flags)
* Description
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
index f25b719ac786..f76dafe2427e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -397,26 +397,35 @@ static void bpf_ringbuf_commit(void *sample, u64 flags, bool discard)
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_ringbuf_submit, void *, sample, u64, flags)
{
+ if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP | BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
bpf_ringbuf_commit(sample, flags, false /* discard */);
+
return 0;
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ringbuf_submit_proto = {
.func = bpf_ringbuf_submit,
- .ret_type = RET_VOID,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM,
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_ringbuf_discard, void *, sample, u64, flags)
{
+
+ if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP | BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
bpf_ringbuf_commit(sample, flags, true /* discard */);
+
return 0;
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ringbuf_discard_proto = {
.func = bpf_ringbuf_discard,
- .ret_type = RET_VOID,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM,
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 3d6d324184c0..d19c8c2688a2 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4073,7 +4073,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Valid pointer with *size* bytes of memory available; NULL,
* otherwise.
*
- * void bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags)
+ * int bpf_ringbuf_submit(void *data, u64 flags)
* Description
* Submit reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
@@ -4083,9 +4083,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* Return
- * Nothing. Always succeeds.
+ * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
- * void bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags)
+ * int bpf_ringbuf_discard(void *data, u64 flags)
* Description
* Discard reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
@@ -4095,7 +4095,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* Return
- * Nothing. Always succeeds.
+ * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
* u64 bpf_ringbuf_query(void *ringbuf, u64 flags)
* Description
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-28 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-28 16:10 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add 'BPF_RB_MAY_WAKEUP' flag Pedro Tammela
2021-03-28 16:10 ` Pedro Tammela [this message]
2021-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check flags in 'bpf_ringbuf_discard()' and 'bpf_ringbuf_submit()' Song Liu
2021-03-30 14:22 ` Pedro Tammela
2021-03-30 18:12 ` Song Liu
2021-03-31 6:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-03-28 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Add '_wait()' and '_nowait()' macros for 'bpf_ring_buffer__poll()' Pedro Tammela
2021-03-29 16:28 ` Song Liu
2021-03-31 18:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-03-29 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add 'BPF_RB_MAY_WAKEUP' flag Song Liu
2021-03-31 6:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-03 13:34 ` Pedro Tammela
2021-04-03 15:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210328161055.257504-2-pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--to=pctammela@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).