linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.4 kselftest known issues - update
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:30:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a835150-d7f1-1c4a-80cb-d385f799dd14@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a293684f-4ab6-51af-60b1-caf4eb97ff05@linuxfoundation.org>

On 9/26/19 11:41 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Here are the know kselftest issues on Linux 5.4 with
> top commit commit 619e17cf75dd58905aa67ccd494a6ba5f19d6cc6
> on x86_64:
> 
> The goal is to get these addressed before 5.4 comes out.

All of these issues are now fixed, except the bpf llvm dependency.
These fixes should all be in linux-next if they haven't already.

> 
> 3 build failures and status:
> 
> pidfd - undefined reference to `pthread_create' collect2: error: ld 
> returned 1 exit status
> 
> Fixed: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11159517/

In
> 
> bfp (two issues)
> 
> 1. "make TARGETS=bpf kselftest" build fails
> Makefile:127: tools/build/Makefile.include: No such file or directory

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11163601/
In bpf fixes tree

> 
> This is due to recent kbuild changes and I have a patch ready to send.
> 
> 2. Related to llvm latest version dependency. This is a hard dependency.
> Unless users upgrade to latest llvvm, bpf test won't run. The new llvm
> might not be supported on all distros yet, in which case bpf will not
> get tested in some rings and on some architectures.
> 
> gpio
> 
> "make TARGETS=gpio kselftest" build fails
> 
> Makefile:23: tools/build/Makefile.include: No such file or directory

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11163603/

> 
> This is due to recent kbuild changes and I have a patch ready to send.
> 
> kvm
> 
> "make TARGETS=kvm kselftest" build fails due --no-pie flags.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11171893/

I haven't found any new ones on x86_64 as of 5.4-rc1

thanks,
-- Shuah

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-26 17:41 Linux 5.4 kselftest known issues Shuah Khan
2019-10-03 14:30 ` shuah [this message]
2019-10-04  9:43   ` Linux 5.4 kselftest known issues - update Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a835150-d7f1-1c4a-80cb-d385f799dd14@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).