Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests

From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	rppt@linux.ibm.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:35:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g47d3=drrSAOMpn_BOf8Gw94mfdJ6NrmroRf4a__=PCEWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11977708-bb18-e322-db7a-9f21d7cdec54@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/30/20 5:08 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> >
> > Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on
> > late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately.  Centralized
> > execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests
> > when loaded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  include/kunit/test.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  lib/kunit/Makefile   |  3 +-
> >  lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c
> >
> > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> > index 2dfb550c6723a..8a02f93a6b505 100644
> > --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
>
> The following fragment does not match the test.h in Linux 5.5 or 5.4-rc1 (as one
> possible earlier version).  And we are not to Linux 5.5-rc1 yet.  (Simple way
> to check for the mis-match - 5.5 has kunit_test_suite() instead of
> kunit_test_suites().)
>
> I know that there is an alternate tree where some of the development occurs.
> Can you please add a link in MAINTAINERS?  And please note (at least in
> patch 0) what tree the series is developed against?

Yep, I was planning on sending an update to the MAINTAINERS with that
and some other updates soon.

In future revisions, I will put a link to the tree I developed
against. In the meantime, we send pull-requests from here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/log/?h=kunit

And that is what I used as my development base for this series.