linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] Add KUnit Struct to Current Task
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:42:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKFsvULUx3qi_kMGJx69ndzCgq=m2xf4XWrYRYBCViud0P7qqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003241635230.30637@localhost>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:40 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Patricia Alfonso wrote:
>
> > In order to integrate debugging tools like KASAN into the KUnit
> > framework, add KUnit struct to the current task to keep track of the
> > current KUnit test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 04278493bf15..1fbfa0634776 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1180,6 +1180,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> >       unsigned int                    kasan_depth;
> >  #endif
> >
> > +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
>
> This patch set looks great! You might have noticed I
> refreshed the kunit resources stuff to incorporate
> feedback from Brendan, but I don't think any API changes
> were made that should have consequences for your code
> (I'm building with your patches on top to make sure).
> I'd suggest promoting from RFC to v3 on the next round
> unless anyone objects.
>
> As Dmitry suggested, the above could likely be changed to be
> "#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT" as kunit can be built as a
> module also. More on this in patch 2..
>
I suppose this could be changed so that this can be used in possible
future scenarios, but for now, since built-in things can't rely on
modules, the KASAN integration relies on KUnit being built-in.

> > +     struct kunit                    *kunit_test;
> > +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> >       /* Index of current stored address in ret_stack: */
> >       int                             curr_ret_stack;
> > --
> > 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog
> >
> >

-- 
Best,
Patricia

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-24 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 16:42 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] KASAN/KUnit Integration Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-19 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] Add KUnit Struct to Current Task Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-24 11:32   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-24 16:39   ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-24 17:42     ` Patricia Alfonso [this message]
2020-03-25 12:42       ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-25 19:00         ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-30 19:30           ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-31  7:48             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-24 18:12   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-19 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] KUnit: KASAN Integration Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-24 16:45   ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-24 17:48     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-19 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] KASAN: Port KASAN Tests to KUnit Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-24 11:24   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-24 15:05     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-26  9:12       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-26 15:15         ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-27  5:31           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-30 18:57             ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-31 10:12               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-24 16:48   ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-24 17:52     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-24 18:20   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-26  9:10   ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKFsvULUx3qi_kMGJx69ndzCgq=m2xf4XWrYRYBCViud0P7qqA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=trishalfonso@google.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).