linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: sean.j.christopherson@intel.com
Cc: TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, bp@suse.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
	jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmattson@google.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	lenb@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	tony.luck@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] x86/cpufeatures: Add flag to track whether MSR IA32_FEAT_CTL is configured
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:49:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e741196d-52aa-0f5e-8f1e-a37ddf2e5025@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191221044513.21680-14-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

Hi Sean,

> Add a new feature flag, X86_FEATURE_MSR_IA32_FEAT_CTL, to track whether
> IA32_FEAT_CTL has been initialized.  This will allow KVM, and any future
> subsystems that depend on IA32_FEAT_CTL, to rely purely on cpufeatures
> to query platform support, e.g. allows a future patch to remove KVM's
> manual IA32_FEAT_CTL MSR checks.
> 
> Various features (on platforms that support IA32_FEAT_CTL) are dependent
> on IA32_FEAT_CTL being configured and locked, e.g. VMX and LMCE.  The
> MSR is always configured during boot, but only if the CPU vendor is
> recognized by the kernel.  Because CPUID doesn't incorporate the current
> IA32_FEAT_CTL value in its reporting of relevant features, it's possible
> for a feature to be reported as supported in cpufeatures but not truly
> enabled, e.g. if the CPU supports VMX but the kernel doesn't recognize
> the CPU.
> 
> As a result, without the flag, KVM would see VMX as supported even if
> IA32_FEAT_CTL hasn't been initialized, and so would need to manually
> read the MSR and check the various enabling bits to avoid taking an
> unexpected #GP on VMXON.


I recently ran into a general protection fault that I believe is the
fault of this patch:

> [   32.189584] general protection fault, maybe for address 0xffffb567801bcf58: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [   32.198103] CPU: 1 PID: 2600 Comm: rngd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-jk+ #2
> [   32.204454] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600STQ/S2600STQ, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
> [   32.214887] RIP: 0010:hardware_enable+0x100/0x1a0 [kvm_intel]
> [   32.220628] Code: 00 00 48 39 f8 74 0f 65 48 89 3d 43 a2 cb 3c e8 66 d3 cc c5 66 90 48 89 df 57 9d 0f 1f 44 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 90 3d ca c5 <f3> 0f c7 34 24 31 c0 80 3d 59 8d 03 00 00 75 36 48 8b 5c 24 10 65
> [   32.239373] RSP: 0000:ffffb567801bcf58 EFLAGS: 00010002
> [   32.244598] RAX: 0000000000300000 RBX: 0000000000000086 RCX: ffff8f2650440000
> [   32.251730] RDX: 0000000000300000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8f2650457020
> [   32.258862] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 000000077ea5d531 R09: 0000000000000000
> [   32.265986] R10: 000001432bf20982 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffd55b80467110
> [   32.273118] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [   32.280243] FS:  00007facfe66f700(0000) GS:ffff8f2650440000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   32.288329] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [   32.294077] CR2: 00007facf0003000 CR3: 0000000b7d402006 CR4: 00000000007626e0
> [   32.301210] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [   32.308342] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [   32.315474] PKRU: 55555554
> [   32.318186] Call Trace:
> [   32.320642]  <IRQ>
> [   32.322689]  kvm_arch_hardware_enable+0x84/0x240 [kvm]
> [   32.327836]  hardware_enable_nolock+0x31/0x60 [kvm]
> [   32.332717]  flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x4d/0xe0
> [   32.337683]  smp_call_function_interrupt+0x3a/0xd0
> [   32.342471]  call_function_interrupt+0xf/0x20
> [   32.346830]  </IRQ>
> [   32.348935] RIP: 0033:0x7facffd4c753
> [   32.352514] Code: e8 48 c7 45 e0 00 00 00 00 eb 5f 48 8b 45 c8 48 8b 50 38 48 8b 45 c8 8b 40 40 89 c0 48 01 d0 48 89 45 f0 48 8b 45 f0 0f b6 00 <83> c0 01 89 c2 48 8b 45 f0 88 10 48 8b 45 c8 8b 50 40 48 8b 45 c8
> [   32.371263] RSP: 002b:00007facfe66ebf0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff03
> [   32.378826] RAX: 00000000000000ee RBX: 0000000000004097 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [   32.385961] RDX: 0000562781dbadf0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007ffd7edf9080
> [   32.393092] RBP: 00007facfe66ec30 R08: 00007ffd7edf9080 R09: 000000000000cd4a
> [   32.400226] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> [   32.407358] R13: 00007facf0000b20 R14: 0000562781dba2e8 R15: 00007facfe66ed10
> [   32.414493] Modules linked in: ip6table_mangle ip6table_nat iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter rfkill ib_isert iscsi
> _target_mod ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib vfat fat ib_umad rpcrdma sunrpc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common rdma_ucm ib_iser rdma_cm isst_if_common iw_cm ib_cm libiscsi skx_edac scsi_transport_iscsi nfit libnv
> dimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel intel_cstate i40iw qat_c62x iTCO_wdt ipmi_ssif iTCO_vendor_support ib_uverbs mei_me intel_qat intel_uncore ib_c
> ore joydev intel_rapl_perf pcspkr ipmi_si authenc ioatdma mei i2c_i801 lpc_ich dca ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad ip_tables ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper cec drm ice i40e crc32
> c_intel wmi fuse
> [   32.498314] ---[ end trace bfeeeba337a01208 ]---

I noticed that a slightly older commit from before this does not fail.
Additionally, the system reports the following during boot:

kvm: disabled by bios

I looked into the vmx_disabled_by_bios and noticed that it checks for
both X86_FEATURE_MSR_IA32_FEAT_CTL and X86_FEATURE_VMX.

Compared to the older code before commit a4d0b2fdbcf7 ("KVM: VMX: Use
VMX feature flag to query BIOS enabling") it's not clear to me how
exactly this could fail to match up.

I suspect something is wrong and the features are enabled even though
the BIOS has it disabled, leading to later failure because of this.

Thanks,
Jake

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-21  4:44 [PATCH v5 00/19] x86/cpu: Clean up handling of VMX features Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:44 ` [PATCH v5 01/19] x86/msr-index: Clean up bit defines for IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:44 ` [PATCH v5 02/19] selftests: kvm: Replace manual MSR defs with common msr-index.h Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:44 ` [PATCH v5 03/19] tools arch x86: Sync msr-index.h from kernel sources Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:44 ` [PATCH v5 04/19] x86/intel: Initialize IA32_FEAT_CTL MSR at boot Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:44 ` [PATCH v5 05/19] x86/mce: WARN once if IA32_FEAT_CTL MSR is left unlocked Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/19] x86/centaur: Use common IA32_FEAT_CTL MSR initialization Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/19] x86/zhaoxin: " Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/19] x86/cpu: Clear VMX feature flag if VMX is not fully enabled Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/19] x86/vmx: Introduce VMX_FEATURES_* Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/19] x86/cpu: Detect VMX features on Intel, Centaur and Zhaoxin CPUs Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/19] x86/cpu: Print VMX flags in /proc/cpuinfo using VMX_FEATURES_* Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/19] x86/cpu: Set synthetic VMX cpufeatures during init_ia32_feat_ctl() Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/19] x86/cpufeatures: Add flag to track whether MSR IA32_FEAT_CTL is configured Sean Christopherson
2020-02-25 21:49   ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2020-02-25 22:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-25 22:52       ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-25 23:29         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-25 23:54           ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-26  0:41             ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-26  0:42             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-26  0:58               ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-26 20:41                 ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-26 20:57                   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-26 21:03                     ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-26 21:25                       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-26 21:53                         ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-27  2:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-27  4:20       ` Huang, Kai
2020-02-27 18:09       ` Jacob Keller
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/19] KVM: VMX: Drop initialization of IA32_FEAT_CTL MSR Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/19] KVM: VMX: Use VMX feature flag to query BIOS enabling Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 16/19] KVM: VMX: Check for full VMX support when verifying CPU compatibility Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 17/19] KVM: VMX: Use VMX_FEATURE_* flags to define VMCS control bits Sean Christopherson
2020-01-13 18:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-13 18:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-13 18:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-13 18:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-13 18:52           ` [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Rename define to CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING Borislav Petkov
2020-01-13 20:16             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-14  9:31               ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-14 17:27                 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 18/19] perf/x86: Provide stubs of KVM helpers for non-Intel CPUs Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 19/19] KVM: VMX: Allow KVM_INTEL when building for Centaur and/or Zhaoxin CPUs Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e741196d-52aa-0f5e-8f1e-a37ddf2e5025@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).