From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v6] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:18:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fad58e4f48237894de0d511adf1d663a42a2eee7.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47OZ8x9=etJUj4Sgsw38VQb0j=omOUsubc7+pb2rJi0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 09:35 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Agreed. I can see the point of not wanting to write an exception into
> checkpatch for every exception of it's general rules; however, it
> would be nice if there was a way to maybe have a special comment or
> something that could turn off a checkpatch error. That way, a
> checkpatch error/warning always means some action should be taken, and
> if a rule is being ignored, there is always documentation as to why.
That couldn't work when a comment which may exist
in a file is out of scope of the patch context.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 22:46 [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v6] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list David Gow
2019-10-29 13:00 ` shuah
2019-10-30 8:02 ` David Gow
2019-10-30 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-30 16:27 ` shuah
2019-10-30 16:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-30 17:18 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2019-10-31 8:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-31 10:07 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 10:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-30 18:46 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-30 19:15 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 6:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-11-01 10:50 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-30 19:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-30 19:23 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 7:12 ` David Gow
2019-10-31 7:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-11-01 16:49 ` shuah
2019-10-30 16:31 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 18:50 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-01 10:25 ` David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fad58e4f48237894de0d511adf1d663a42a2eee7.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).