From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: Generic RGB LED support was Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: lp5024: Add the LP5024/18 RGB LED driver Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1594152a-4f57-e258-5c9c-e1b158c72932@gmail.com> References: <986b5105-2fdb-bd25-7c8a-ca8fd1ade821@gmail.com> <7f205102-e854-f1cb-cc03-1307d1cddc87@gmail.com> <20190104201256.GA2931@amd> <20190104220726.GA12395@amd> <4cf79414-578e-eea7-4f46-fc8789206988@gmail.com> <20190105123146.GA16354@amd> <8044cdd9-b9b3-fddd-6106-184b906859e2@gmail.com> <20190105221254.GA22322@amd> <70366f2a-aafd-174f-73ec-a8117133b7af@gmail.com> <2c3425b0-70af-1f38-35ee-0af857bf0539@gmail.com> <63713076-b111-316d-7e60-9b799ff22c0a@gmail.com> <0a163b0c-eabc-6cf0-c605-28622af3d31d@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0a163b0c-eabc-6cf0-c605-28622af3d31d@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Murphy , Pavel Machek Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VmVzYSBKw6TDpHNrZWzDpGluZW4=?= , robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Dan, On 1/10/19 1:46 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Jacek > > On 1/8/19 3:25 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Jacek >> >> On 1/8/19 3:18 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> Hi Dan, >>> >>> On 1/7/19 10:14 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>> Jacek >>>> >>>> On 1/7/19 2:59 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>> Dan, >>>>> >>>>> On 1/7/19 8:36 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>> Jacek >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/7/19 1:13 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:52 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Pavel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 11:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Grab yourself an RGB LED and play with it; you'll see what the >>>>>>>>>>> problems are. It is hard to explain colors over email... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Video [0] gives some overview of lp5024 capabilities. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't see any problems in exposing separate red,green,blue >>>>>>>>>> files and brightness for the devices with hardware support for >>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, that's what we do today, as three separate LEDs, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. It doesn't allow for setting color intensity by having >>>>>>>> the color fixed beforehand. Below is relevant excerpt from >>>>>>>> the lp5024 documentation. This is not something that can be >>>>>>>> mapped to RGB color space, but rather to HSV/HSL, with the >>>>>>>> reservation that the hardware implementation uses PWM >>>>>>>> for setting color intensity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 8.3.1.2 Independent Intensity Control Per RGB LED Module >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When color is fixed, the independent intensity-control is used to >>>>>>>> achieve accurate and flexible dimming control for every RGB LED module. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 8.3.1.2.1 Intensity-Control Register Configuration >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Every three consecutive output channels are assigned to their respective >>>>>>>> intensity-control register (LEDx_BRIGHTNESS). For example, OUT0, OUT1, >>>>>>>> and OUT2 are assigned to LED0_BRIGHTNESS, so it is recommended to >>>>>>>> connect the RGB LEDs in the sequence as shown in Table 1. The LP50xx >>>>>>>> device allows 256-step intensity control for each RGB LED module, which >>>>>>>> helps achieve a smooth dimming effect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't have problem with that, either; other drivers already do >>>>>>>>> that. He's free to use existing same interface. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But that is insufficient, as it does not allow simple stuff, such as >>>>>>>>> turning led "white". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So... perhaps we should agree on requirements, first, and then we can >>>>>>>>> discuss solutions? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Requirements for RGB LED interface: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) Userspace should be able to set the white color >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2) Userspace should be able to arbitrary color from well known list >>>>>>>>> and it should approximately match what would CRT, LCD or OLED monitor display >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The difference is that monitor display driver is pre-calibrated >>>>>>>> for given display by the manufacturer. With the LED controllers the >>>>>>>> manufacturer has no control over what LEDs will be connected to the >>>>>>>> iouts. Therefore it should be not surprising that colors produced >>>>>>>> by custom LEDs are not as user would expect when comparing to >>>>>>>> the RGB color displayed on the monitor display. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TI provides "Various LED Ring Lighting Patterns Reference Design" [0] >>>>>>>> that show how to produce various patterns with use of the reference >>>>>>>> board with LED ring built using sixteen 19-337/R6GHBHC-A01/2T LEDs [1]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Document [0] mentions also specific "Design considerations" in the >>>>>>>> chapter 2.2: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Several considerations are taken into account for this particular design: >>>>>>>> • LED map (ring) for meeting the requirement of popular human-machine interaction style. >>>>>>>> • LED size, numbers and the diffuse design for meeting lighting pattern uniformity. >>>>>>>> • Analog dimming in the difference ambient light lux without losing dimming resolution in lighting pattern. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These considerations apply to most human-machine interaction end equipment with day and night vision >>>>>>>> designs in some way, but the designer must decide the particular considerations to take into account for a >>>>>>>> specific design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This renders your requirement 2) infeasible with use of custom LEDs >>>>>>>> any fixed algorithm, since the final effect will always heavily depend >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typo here: s/any fixed/and fixed/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> on the LED circuit design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>        2a) LEDs probably slightly change color as they age. That's out of >>>>>>>>>        scope, unless the variation is much greater than on monitors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>        2b) Manufacturing differences cause small color variation. Again, >>>>>>>>>        that's out of scope, unless the variation is much greater than on >>>>>>>>>        monitors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nice to have features: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3) Full range of available colors/intensities should be available to >>>>>>>>> userspace >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 4) Interface should work well with existing triggers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 5) It would be nice if userland knew how many lumens are produced at >>>>>>>>> each wavelength for each setting (again, minus aging and manufacturing >>>>>>>>> variations). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 6) Complexity of math in kernel should be low, and preferably it >>>>>>>>> should be integer or fixed point >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Problems: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> a) RGB LEDs are usually not balanced. Setting 100% PWM on >>>>>>>>> red/green/blue channels will result in nothing close to white >>>>>>>>> light. In fact, to get white light on N900, blue and green channel's >>>>>>>>> PWM needs to be set pretty low, as in 5%. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> b) LED class does not define any relation between "brightness" in >>>>>>>>> sysfs and ammount of light in lumens. Some drivers use close to linear >>>>>>>>> relation, some use exponential relation. Human eyes percieve logarithm >>>>>>>>> of lumens. RGB color model uses even more complex function. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> c) Except for white LEDs, LEDs are basically sources of single >>>>>>>>> wavelength of light, while CRTs and LCDs produce broader >>>>>>>>> spectrums. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> d) RG, RGBW and probably other LED combinations exist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> e) Not all "red" LEDs will produce same wavelength. Similar >>>>>>>>> differences will exist for other colors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> f) We have existing RGB LEDs represented as three separate >>>>>>>>> monochromatic LEDs in sysfs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One general question: do you have any solutions in store? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiduee6/tiduee6.pdf >>>>>>>> [1] http://www.everlight.com/file/ProductFile/19-337-R6GHBHC-A01-2T.pdf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I just wanted to point out that there are 4 total devices right now that use the same mapping >>>>>> >>>>>> LP5018, LP5024, LP5030 and the LP5036. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can implement what ever we would like to I just need to know what to design against. >>>>> >>>>> As you can see from the discussion in this thread it may take some >>>>> time to work out the interface satisfying everyone. I made some design >>>>> proposal, but Pavel had no warm word for it. It would be easier if >>>>> we had more opinions. >>>> >>>> I got it from the threads and just the time invested in the FW and HSV. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> How do you feel about using brightness file for setting LEDn_BRIGHTNESS? >>>> >>>> I am using that now.  The brightness file will adjust the overall brightness of the LED group >>>> or bank pending on how the LEDs are grouped in the DT file. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does increasing LEDn_BRIGHTNESS value (i.e. color intensity) feel like >>>>> increasing color lightness (i.e. the pattern presented in the video [0] >>>>> starting from 1:22)? >>>> >>>> No unfortunately this is why I introduced the new files to control the individual RGB intensities >>>> so that the designers can set, tune, create color variations or patterns like the video. >>>> >>>> The RGB group brightness would be independent based on lighting conditions, enclosures and diffusers. >>>> So you could technically be changing color and overall brightness virtually simultaneously >>> >>> Oh, so this is surprising. Now it gets even more obscure to me. >>> >>> It would be really helpful if we could see a video showing >>> the LED effects with regard to the applied settings. >> >> Well I am doing a test off the command line to ensure the user space can interface with the RGB LED. >> >> I can ping someone in product development to see the application of this device if that would help. >> We did give them a test driver to work on their features but told them the driver is not final until it >> is in the mainline kernel >> >> Dan >> >>> >>>>>> But keep in mind I still need to invest my time in the other TI-lmu patches on my list to complete. >>>>> >>>>> Do what you deem most suitable for you. We are here only to help >>>>> merging the patches, but keeping in mind that kernel interface once >>>>> introduced must be preserved forever. Therefore we need to do our >>>>> best to make the best possible design decisions. >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdt-alh8i6E >>>>> >>>> >>>> I understand.  Maybe I can make the files generic to use for either control or individual control. >>>> >>>> We can probably define new ABI's until either HSV or DT frameworks get going.  And them make the file presentation >>>> configurable and default to the new files. >>> >>> I am leaning towards it. Just commented on your patches. >>> >> >> > > Asked the HW team for videos this is what they sent > https://training.ti.com/lp50x-led-drivers-achieve-optimal-color-brightness-zero-audible-noise > https://training.ti.com/how-configuring-led-brightness-color-and-patterns-lp50x-gui-tool > > Not sure how helpful these would be Thank you for the videos - they are helpful, and they confirm my first impression regarding the LEDn_BRIGHTNESS effect. In is shown in the second video starting from 3:37. This is the same what I was asking about previously (video [0] from previous message starting from 1:22). For me this looks similarly to increasing V of HSV or L of HSL [1]. You denied, so either we interpret colors differently, or there was some misunderstanding. [1] http://hslpicker.com -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski