Hi!

> >No need to move ctrl_brt_pointer... to keep order consistent with docs.
> 
> OK I will reset the patches and get rid of that change.  I think this got
> moved when I applied the v1 patch.
> 
> 
> >>+		fs_current_val = led->full_scale_current - LM3532_FS_CURR_MIN /
> >>+				 LM3532_FS_CURR_STEP;
> >The computation is wrong ... needs () AFAICT.
> 
> Hmm. Doesn't order of operations take precedence?
> 
> I will add the () unless checkpatch cribs about them

I may be misunderstanding. What do you expect the computation to be? /
has higher priority than -, right? Can you test it provides expected
results?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html