linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>,
	Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] resend patch - bcache may mistakenly write data to another disk when writes error
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:46:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95f338d2-5855-5ce5-f0ce-c0f6b648e794@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <324885c4-a211-fb11-8315-979935391820@suse.com>

Add another comment.

The key of commit 2938b4dcc & 6b0d969b is function _invalidate_fd().
But from my analysis, it looks your codes do not fix this issue.

_invalidate_fd calls bcache_invalidate_fd & bcache_abort_fd.
bcache_invalidate_fd work as before, only return true or false to indicate there is or isn't fd in cache->errored.
Then bcache_abort_fd calls _abort_v, _abort_v calls _unlink_block & _free_block.
These two functions only delist block from currently cache->errored & cache->free list.
The data still in radix tree with flags BF_DIRTY.
So when next lvm reuses closed error fd, and calls _lookup_or_read_block (with legacy fd), the data will reuse again.
The bug will be trigger.

Thanks,
zhm

On 10/29/19 1:07 PM, heming.zhao wrote:
> Hello Joe,
> 
> Please check my comments for your commit 2938b4dcc & 6b0d969b
> 
> 1. b->ref_count is non-zero, and write error happens, the data never release?
>  �� (no place to call _unlink_block & _free_block)
> 
> 2. when dev_write_bytes failed, call dev_unset_last_byte with "fd=-1" is wrong.
> 
> 3. I still think below error handling should be added.
>  �� Below base on stable-2.02, but the core idea is same, should access the return value of io_submit & io_getevents.
> ```
> static bool _async_issue(struct io_engine *ioe, enum dir d, int fd,
>  �� ... ...
>  ��� if (r < 0) {
>  ������� _cb_free(e->cbs, cb);
> +������ ((struct block *)context)->error = r; <== assign errno & print warning
> +������ log_warn("io_submit <%c> off %llu bytes %llu return %d:%s",
> +���������� (d == DIR_READ) ? 'R' : 'W', (long long unsigned)offset,
> +���������� (long long unsigned)nbytes, r, strerror(-r));
>  ������� return false;
>  ��� }
> 
> static void _issue_low_level(struct block *b, enum dir d)
>  �� ... ...
>  ��� dm_list_move(&cache->io_pending, &b->list);
> 
>  ��� if (!cache->engine->issue(cache->engine, d, b->fd, sb, se, b->data, b)) {
> -������ /* FIXME: if io_submit() set an errno, return that instead of EIO? */
> -������ _complete_io(b, -EIO);
> +������ _complete_io(b, b->error); <=== this pass the right errno to caller.
>  ������� return;
>  ��� }
>  �}
> 
> -static void _wait_all(struct bcache *cache)
> +static bool _wait_all(struct bcache *cache) <=== change to return error
>  �{
> +�� bool ret = true;
>  ��� while (!dm_list_empty(&cache->io_pending))
> -������ _wait_io(cache);
> +������ ret = _wait_io(cache);
> +�� return ret;
>  �}
> 
> -static void _wait_specific(struct block *b)
> +static bool _wait_specific(struct block *b) <=== change to return error
>  �{
> +�� bool ret = true;
>  ��� while (_test_flags(b, BF_IO_PENDING))
> -������ _wait_io(b->cache);
> +������ ret = _wait_io(b->cache);
> +�� return ret;
>  �}
> 
>  �bool bcache_flush(struct bcache *cache) <==== add more error handling
>  �{
> +�� bool write_ret = true, wait_ret = true;
> 
>  ��� ... ...
>  ������� _issue_write(b);
> +������ if (b->error) write_ret = false;
>  ��� }
> 
> -�� _wait_all(cache);
> +�� wait_ret = _wait_all(cache);
> 
> -�� return dm_list_empty(&cache->errored);
> +�� if (write_ret == false || wait_ret == false ||
> +���������� !dm_list_empty(&cache->errored))
> +������ return false;
> +�� else
> +������ return true;
>  �}
> ```
> 
> Thanks,
> zhm
> 
> On 10/28/19 11:43 PM, Joe Thornber wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:06:18AM +0000, Heming Zhao wrote:
>>> First fail is in bcache_flush, then bcache_invalidate_fd does nothing because the data
>>> in cache->errored, which not belongs to dirty & clean list. Then the data mistakenly
>>> move from cache->errored into cache->dirty by "bcache_get => _lookup_or_read_block"
>>> (because the data holds BF_DIRTY flag).
>>
>> I just pushed a couple of patches that will hopefully fix this issue for you:
>>
>> commit 6b0d969b2a85ba69046afa26af4d7bcddddbccd5 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD, 2019-10-11-bcache-purge)
>> Author: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
>> Date:�� Mon Oct 28 15:01:47 2019 +0000
>>
>> ���� [label] Use bcache_abort_fd() to ensure blocks are no longer in the cache.
>> ���� The return value from bcache_invalidate_fd() was not being checked.
>> ���� So I've introduced a little function, _invalidate_fd() that always
>> ���� calls bcache_abort_fd() if the write fails.
>>
>> commit 2938b4dcca0a1df661758abfab7f402ea7aab018
>> Author: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
>> Date:�� Mon Oct 28 14:29:47 2019 +0000
>>
>> ���� [bcache] add bcache_abort()
>> ���� This gives us a way to cope with write failures.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Also there are big changes to bcache coming, that remove file descriptors from
>> the interface completely.� See the branch 2019-09-05-add-io-manager for more info
>> (bcache has been renamed io_manager).
>>
>> - Joe
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-lvm mailing list
>> linux-lvm@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-29  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22  9:47 [linux-lvm] resend patch - bcache may mistakenly write data to another disk when writes error Heming Zhao
2019-10-23 21:31 ` Joe Thornber
2019-10-24  3:06   ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-28 15:43     ` Joe Thornber
2019-10-29  5:07       ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-29  9:46         ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2019-10-29 11:05           ` Joe Thornber
2019-10-29 11:47             ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-29 14:41               ` Joe Thornber
2019-10-29 11:01         ` Joe Thornber
2019-10-29 11:41           ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-24  3:13   ` Heming Zhao
2019-10-28  8:38     ` Heming Zhao
     [not found] <fc8ca0d7-23d9-8145-05e5-27a7ea2a7682@suse.com>
     [not found] ` <872328cd-3d51-97bb-1c50-b54cc194c6f2@suse.com>
2019-11-12 15:21   ` David Teigland
     [not found]     ` <667efc9f-1001-37cc-c0af-b352ff366c03@suse.com>
2019-11-13 15:41       ` David Teigland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95f338d2-5855-5ce5-f0ce-c0f6b648e794@suse.com \
    --to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    --cc=thornber@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).