From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/kernel - wire up syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:08:06 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <855486ab-736a-19ad-35c2-174b5eb59898@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVNqgG_6LSSuzMZekE1q7i_V4YisDJQUsjptLDejNGaRw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On 26/08/20 11:23 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 6:19 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> m68k (other than Coldfire) uses syscall_trace for both trace entry
>> and trace exit. Seccomp support requires separate entry points for
>> trace entry and exit which are already provided for Coldfire.
>>
>> Replace syscall_trace by syscall_trace_enter and syscall_trace_leave
>> in preparation for seccomp support. Check return code of
>> syscall_trace_enter(), and skip syscall if nonzero. Return code
>> will be left at what had been set by by ptrace or seccomp.
>>
>> No regression seen in testing with strace on ARAnyM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
> Thanks for your patch!
Thanks for looking into it!
>
>> Changes from RFC v1:
>>
>> - add return code check in do_trace_entry branch to enable syscall
>> filtering (will return -EPERM)
>> - change to use testl for return code check (suggested by Andreas Schwab)
>>
>> Changes from RFC v2:
>>
>> - don't set return code of filtered syscall - seccomp may want to set
>> that for use by calling process.
> As your email subject didn't contain "v3", b4[*] insists on picking up
> RFC v2, and refuses to pick up the latest version, even when forced
Argh - I thought that since the first two were tagged 'RFC', I could
just restart with v1.
Never heard of b4, sorry.
> (msgid not present)...
>
> The patch itself looks good to me. Does it make sense to apply it before
> we have real seccomp support?
As far as I understand Adrian, it's needed as a prerequisite (though I
admit there needs to be another patch adding the actual seccomp bits as
well).
With my rather limited test setup, this was all I could test. I've done
enough damage with 'I think this is how it should work' patches to add
untested stuff.
In my not-at-all-humble opinion, the whole issue of whether to trigger a
syscall abort on any non-zero return code, or just -1, is quite academic
so I'd rather keep the broader non-zero test (unless someone points to a
clear-cut reason why this is a Bad Thing).
Cheers,
Michael
>
> [*] https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/introducing-b4-and-patch-attestation
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 10:03 syscall_trace_enter and syscall_trace_leave for m68k w/MMU John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-07-23 22:56 ` Michael Schmitz
2020-07-25 1:48 ` [PATCH RFC] m68k/kernel - wire up syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k Michael Schmitz
2020-07-26 1:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2] " Michael Schmitz
2020-07-27 4:19 ` [PATCH] " Michael Schmitz
2020-07-27 10:03 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-07-27 20:48 ` Michael Schmitz
2020-07-27 21:09 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-26 11:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-26 11:50 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-26 11:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-26 11:27 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-26 12:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-26 12:35 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-26 12:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-26 12:42 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-26 14:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-27 0:08 ` Michael Schmitz [this message]
2020-08-27 9:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-27 19:29 ` Michael Schmitz
2020-08-28 8:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-14 22:11 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-06-14 23:04 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-06-14 23:14 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-06-15 7:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-15 20:32 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-06-16 0:27 ` Michael Schmitz
2020-08-05 12:23 ` syscall_trace_enter and syscall_trace_leave for m68k w/MMU Greg Ungerer
2020-08-05 12:36 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=855486ab-736a-19ad-35c2-174b5eb59898@gmail.com \
--to=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).