linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: For review: pidfd_send_signal(2) manual page
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:23:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923142325.jowzbnwjw7g7si7j@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnjr9rth.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:26:34PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Michael Kerrisk:
> 
> > SYNOPSIS
> >        int pidfd_send_signal(int pidfd, int sig, siginfo_t info,
> >                              unsigned int flags);
> 
> This probably should reference a header for siginfo_t.

Agreed.

> 
> >        ESRCH  The target process does not exist.
> 
> If the descriptor is valid, does this mean the process has been waited
> for?  Maybe this can be made more explicit.

If by valid you mean "refers to a process/thread-group leader" aka is a
pidfd then yes: Getting ESRCH means that the process has exited and has
already been waited upon.
If it had only exited but not waited upon aka is a zombie, then sending
a signal will just work because that's currently how sending signals to
zombies works, i.e. if you only send a signal and don't do any
additional checks you won't notice a difference between a process being
alive and a process being a zombie. The userspace visible behavior in
terms of signaling them is identical.

> 
> >        The  pidfd_send_signal()  system call allows the avoidance of race
> >        conditions that occur when using traditional interfaces  (such  as
> >        kill(2)) to signal a process.  The problem is that the traditional
> >        interfaces specify the target process via a process ID (PID), with
> >        the  result  that the sender may accidentally send a signal to the
> >        wrong process if the originally intended target process has termi‐
> >        nated  and its PID has been recycled for another process.  By con‐
> >        trast, a PID file descriptor is a stable reference to  a  specific
> >        process;  if  that  process  terminates,  then the file descriptor
> >        ceases to be  valid  and  the  caller  of  pidfd_send_signal()  is
> >        informed of this fact via an ESRCH error.
> 
> It would be nice to explain somewhere how you can avoid the race using
> a PID descriptor.  Is there anything else besides CLONE_PIDFD?

If you're the parent of the process you can do this without CLONE_PIDFD:
pid = fork();
pidfd = pidfd_open();
ret = pidfd_send_signal(pidfd, 0, NULL, 0);
if (ret < 0 && errno == ESRCH)
	/* pidfd refers to another, recycled process */

> 
> >        static
> >        int pidfd_send_signal(int pidfd, int sig, siginfo_t *info,
> >                unsigned int flags)
> >        {
> >            return syscall(__NR_pidfd_send_signal, pidfd, sig, info, flags);
> >        }
> 
> Please use a different function name.  Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-23  9:12 For review: pidfd_send_signal(2) manual page Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-23 11:26 ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-23 14:23   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2019-09-24 19:44     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-24 19:57       ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24 20:07         ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-24 21:00         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-24 21:08           ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-25 13:46             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-24 21:53           ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-25 13:46             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-25 13:51               ` Florian Weimer
2019-09-25 14:02                 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-25 13:53               ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-25 14:29                 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-24 19:43   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-25  1:48   ` Jann Horn
2019-09-23 11:31 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-24 19:42   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-23 14:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-09-23 20:27   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2019-09-23 21:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-09-24 19:10   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190923142325.jowzbnwjw7g7si7j@wittgenstein \
    --to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).