linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: enh <enh@google.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pthread_kill.3: Update to match POSIX.
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:38:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imnodbct.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJgzZoojiRmTV_5sAXhqQciAKsQ_d+znT1OnxT0Rpa_-N_G5-Q@mail.gmail.com> (enh's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:36:28 -0800")

* enh:

> POSIX removed ESRCH years ago.
>
> In resolving http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1214 it was made
> clear that callers can't rely on using signal 0 to test for the
> continued existence of a thread. Update the man page to make it clearer
> that this doesn't generally work (even if it sometimes seems to).
>
> See also the long explanation of why this is the case (and how to fix
> your code) here:
>
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/master/docs/status.md#invalid-handling-targetsdkversion-o

Well, if you fix the thread exit race (like musl did, and glibc should
as well, see bug 12889), you could get a reliable ESRCH as a side
effect.  Pity that POSIX doesn't allow that.

I think this might be a case where common (but not unavoidable)
implementation problems get in the way of a better standard.  Usually,
it's the other way round.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 20:36 [PATCH] pthread_kill.3: Update to match POSIX enh
2019-11-12 21:38 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-11-12 21:40   ` enh
2019-11-12 21:52     ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-12 22:06       ` enh
2019-11-12 22:11         ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-12 22:22           ` enh
2019-11-12 22:28             ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-13  5:27               ` enh
2019-11-13  5:51                 ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-13  5:59                   ` enh
2019-11-13  6:10                     ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-09 23:00                       ` enh
2021-11-10  7:14                         ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-12  0:01                           ` enh
2021-11-12 13:02                             ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87imnodbct.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=enh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).