From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:31:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgNAkggayFEjHgPNu1HzvXGfSDoCq=Y-Ni4iv=RBYk2Eb6U1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720165205.GI30452@arm.com>
Hello Dave,
TL;DR: don't worry about the small stuff; I'm happy to do the minor
edits given the high quality of your patches.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 18:52, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > On 6/24/20 7:36 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > A bunch of updates to the prctl(2) man page to fill in missing
> > > prctls (mostly) up to Linux 5.6 (along with a few other tweaks and
> > > fixes).
> > >
> > > Patches from the v2 series [1] that have been applied or rejected
> > > already have been dropped.
> > >
> > > All that remain here now are the SVE and tagged address ABI controls
> > > for arm64.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/1590614258-24728-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Dave Martin (2):
> > > prctl.2: Add SVE prctls (arm64)
> > > prctl.2: Add tagged address ABI control prctls (arm64)
> > >
> > > man2/prctl.2 | 331 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 331 insertions(+)
> > Thanks. I've pushed these changes to master now.
>
> Thanks -- btw I finally got around to reviewing master, and noted a few
> editorial changes that man-pages(7) does not make any statement about:
>
> "arg1, arg2, and arg3"
>
> Do you strictly prefer the command before "and" here?
>
> Conventionally, the final comma would typically be omitted in
> prose, except where the list members are complex enough that the
> command is required to assist parsing. However, lists of formal
> arguments are not quite vanilla prose.
There are two camps wrt that comma. I prefer the so-called Oxford
comma convention, as shown above. man-pages uses it generally.
> "Providing that" -> "Provided that"
>
> Any particular rationale here?
Either would be fine; the past tense is just slightly better, to my ear.
> "error EFOO" -> "the error EFOO"
>
> Is this a rule, in general?
I think the change that you refer to was actually: "with EFOO" to
"with the error EFOO". The former is just a little too brief, to my
ear.
> .IP \(bu 2
>
> I assumed that specifying an explicit indentation amount would
> be fragile. Going with the default behaviour also tends to
> result in a more consistent appearance. Do you have any
> recommandations in this area?
>
> Do you have rules about the order to use bullet symbols? I tend
> to avoid \(bu if possible, since while it's "correct", nroff can
> render it nastily as an unadorned letter "o" (e.g., with -Tascii
> or LC_CTYPE=C). This is particlarly annoying if the indent is
> <= 2, since then the "o" tends to be visually swallowed by the
> following text (i.e., to a casual glance it looks like a word,
> particlarly if the following text is not capitalised). Perhaps
> this is a bad glyph substitution decision in nroff rather than
> something that should be fixed in the man-pages source, but the
> man-pages source may be easier to fix...
>
> There is already inconsistency here: there are may top-level
> lists using ".IP *" in prctl.2, and plenty of places where the
> default indentation is used.
I must admit that I'm in the process of rethinking bulleted lists, and
I have not come to a conclusion (and that's why nothing is said in
man-pages(7), and also why there is currently inconsistency).
Using .IP with the default indent (8n) results in a very deep indent
between the glyph and the text, so it's not my preference.
Your note about the poor rendering with "-Tascii" is interesting.
Perhaps ".IP \(bu 3" may be better. But, I really do not know: do
people really render with "-Tascii" these days?
> Should any of these be written up in man-pages(7), or is there a checker
> than can detect them?
Perhaps man-pages should say something about the Oxford comma.
> I wan't to minimise the amount of tweaking you have to do when merging
> patches.
If every patch that I received was of the same quality as yours are,
my life would be much easier. The tweaks are minimal work on my part.
Don't worry. Just send me more patches :-).
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 17:36 [PATCH v3 0/2] prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6 Dave Martin
2020-06-24 17:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] prctl.2: Add SVE prctls (arm64) Dave Martin
2020-06-26 11:23 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-06-24 17:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] prctl.2: Add tagged address ABI control " Dave Martin
2020-06-26 11:23 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-06-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-07-20 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-20 21:31 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2020-07-29 14:56 ` Dave Martin
2020-08-04 12:52 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-08-06 2:34 ` bulleted lists and indentation (was: prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6) G. Branden Robinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKgNAkggayFEjHgPNu1HzvXGfSDoCq=Y-Ni4iv=RBYk2Eb6U1Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).