From: hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ira Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
Brad Love <brad@nextdimension.cc>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/8] videobuf: fix epoll() by calling poll_wait first
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:49:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207114948.37750-8-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207114948.37750-1-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
The epoll function expects that whenever the poll file op is
called, the poll_wait function is also called. That didn't
always happen in videobuf_poll_stream(). Fix this, otherwise
epoll() would timeout when it shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
index 7491b337002c..bbef899f0bf7 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
@@ -1119,13 +1119,14 @@ ssize_t videobuf_read_stream(struct videobuf_queue *q,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(videobuf_read_stream);
__poll_t videobuf_poll_stream(struct file *file,
- struct videobuf_queue *q,
- poll_table *wait)
+ struct videobuf_queue *q,
+ poll_table *wait)
{
__poll_t req_events = poll_requested_events(wait);
struct videobuf_buffer *buf = NULL;
__poll_t rc = 0;
+ poll_wait(file, &buf->done, wait);
videobuf_queue_lock(q);
if (q->streaming) {
if (!list_empty(&q->stream))
@@ -1149,7 +1150,6 @@ __poll_t videobuf_poll_stream(struct file *file,
rc = EPOLLERR;
if (0 == rc) {
- poll_wait(file, &buf->done, wait);
if (buf->state == VIDEOBUF_DONE ||
buf->state == VIDEOBUF_ERROR) {
switch (q->type) {
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-07 11:49 [RFC PATCH 0/8] cec/mc/vb2/dvb: fix epoll support hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] cec: fix epoll() by calling poll_wait first hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-08 20:53 ` Sean Young
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] media-request: " hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] vb2: " hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] v4l2-ctrls.c: " hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] v4l2-mem2mem: " hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] v4l2-mem2mem: add q->error check to v4l2_m2m_poll() hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-07 11:49 ` hverkuil-cisco [this message]
2019-02-07 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] dvb-core: fix epoll() by calling poll_wait first hverkuil-cisco
2019-02-08 21:12 ` Sean Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190207114948.37750-8-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=brad@nextdimension.cc \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).