From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>,
<yi.kuo@mediatek.com>, <acourbot@chromium.org>,
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>, <anthony.huang@mediatek.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:57:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9829a5a-984c-bced-0286-53f9edc8ae3d@collabora.com>
On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:57 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>
> On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Dafna,
> >
> > Thanks very much for the review.
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
> > > > consumer
> > > > and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > > > the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called
> > > > automatically.
> > > >
> > > > CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > CC: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c | 37 +++----
> > > > -------
> > > > --
> > > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 3 --
> > > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c | 1 -
> > > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c | 44 +++----
> > > > -------
[snip]
> > > > void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > > - put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Now that functions only do 'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so
> > > it
> > > will be more
> > > readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
> > > and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > Same for the 'enc' equivalent.
> >
> > Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
> > as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the
> > mtk_vcodec_probe.
> >
> > Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from
> > mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
> > into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok
> > for
> > you?
>
> yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
> I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,
>
> I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files
OK. I will try this.
> since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.
I guess this one should be reserved to vcodec guys. I see this function
is changed at [1]. Let's keep this patchset clean.
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210901083215.25984-10-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/
>
> thanks,
> Dafna
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dafna
> >
> > [snip]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-07 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 1:37 [PATCH v8 00/12] Clean up "mediatek,larb" Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for multimedia HW Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iommu/mediatek-v1: Free the existed fwspec if the master dev already has Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb Yong Wu
2021-09-29 16:33 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 7:14 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices Yong Wu
2021-10-11 12:36 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-16 2:23 ` Yong Wu
2021-10-18 7:13 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-25 3:57 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] media: mtk-mdp: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] drm/mediatek: Add pm runtime support for ovl and rdma Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] drm/mediatek: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29 12:13 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 3:28 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30 10:57 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-07 2:57 ` Yong Wu [this message]
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] memory: mtk-smi: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes Yong Wu
2021-09-29 1:37 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] arm64: " Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=acourbot@chromium.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
--cc=anthony.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eizan@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=irui.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=tiffany.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yi.kuo@mediatek.com \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).