From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF23C4363C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F82212CC for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="K1/QCDET" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727297AbgJGLOo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 07:14:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:41063 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726730AbgJGLOo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 07:14:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602069283; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fau/zTN83bMY5VjH/VZJytUEBBQcb23cQqp/EXNoJ6M=; b=K1/QCDET82+bLznZ3YI+48gN+h/6BGxAq7e1mzBVKbGrTqV3hCDCNuhKClpyPoNU4YiRHs 3QGQ350S4jYK+fqh7aDxzyV3O88d2IGQxzLxYt7wXuXvbEAp40Y9VRN9cu8MMEIdkgLtuE zeSblGocZyFzBotMtr1dDYQ5smd3VcU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-61-DnkgxBYcOVqodkmnnM_rFA-1; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:14:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DnkgxBYcOVqodkmnnM_rFA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55441015EC4; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524F35D9DD; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CB8181A869; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 07:14:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jan Stancek To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Ofer Levi , Rich Felker , Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Guo Ren , Greentime Hu , "Maciej W . Rozycki" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Vincent Chen Message-ID: <1478290725.17134142.1602069275205.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201002202416.28972-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> References: <20201002202416.28972-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] cacheflush01: Rewrite into new API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.208.2, 10.4.195.10] Thread-Topic: cacheflush01: Rewrite into new API Thread-Index: tKyuN72r4BqhTqMg7nWcjHRm2QuUYg== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > This syscall is currently (v5.9) supported on these architectures: > arc, csky, mips, m68k, nds32, sh > > constants are missing for m68k, not sure if the testcase is valid for it. > Untested. > > Test for __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL saves adding autotools check for > . > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > --- > Hi, > > FYI: I was going to ask for removal of this test, but all these archs are > still supported. This test compiles on all archs now, but I haven't run > it (I don't have access to none of these archs, not sure if LTP is even > tested on these archs). I haven't tested it too, but rewrite looks good. Acked-by: Jan Stancek