From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=RVnT=ZN=vger.kernel.org=linux-mips-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA63DC43215
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18E420692
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726716AbfKUQCX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:02:23 -0500
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:46911 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726293AbfKUQCX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:02:23 -0500
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id D87F268BFE; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:02:17 +0100 (CET)
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:02:17 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
Message-ID: <20191121160217.GA1583@lst.de>
References: <20191121092646.8449-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20191121152457.GA525@lst.de> <20191121152650.GA651@lst.de> <70359d2a-10c6-09c7-a857-805085affb0a@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <70359d2a-10c6-09c7-a857-805085affb0a@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-mips.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:39PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hmm, there's no functional dependency though, is there? AFAICS it's 
> essentially just a context conflict. Is it worth simply dropping (or 
> postponing) the local renaming in __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(), or 
> perhaps even cross-merging arm64/for-next/zone-dma into dma/for-next?

I would have no problem with pulling it in.  I'd kinda hate creating
the conflict, though.  So if the arm64 maintainers are fine with it
I'll pull it in, especially if I get an ACK from Robin.