linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhouyanjie <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, paulburton@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	sernia.zhou@foxmail.com, zhenwenjin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust cgu code to make it compatible with X1830.
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:16:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5DF4D2A0.3010603@wanyeetech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1576272301.3.3@crapouillou.net>

Hi Paul,

On 2019年12月14日 05:25, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Zhou,
>
>
> Le ven., déc. 13, 2019 at 23:21, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 
> <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> a écrit :
>> The PLL of X1830 Soc from Ingenic has been greatly changed,
>> the bypass control is placed in another register, so now two
>> registers may needed to control the PLL. To this end, the
>> original "reg" was changed to "pll_reg", and a new "bypass_reg"
>> was introduced. In addition, when calculating rate, the PLL of
>> X1830 introduced an extra 2x multiplier, so a new "rate_multiplier"
>> was introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>>     v1->v2:
>>     1.Use two fields (pll_reg & bypass_reg) instead of the 2-values
>>       array (reg[2]).
>>     2.Remove the "pll_info->version" and add a 
>> "pll_info->rate_multiplier".
>>     3.Fix the coding style and add more detailed commit message.
>>     4.Change my Signed-off-by from "Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>"
>>       to "周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>" because
>>       the old mailbox is in an unstable state.
>>
>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h |  8 ++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>> index 6e96303..ae1ddcb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
>> long parent_rate)
>>      pll_info = &clk_info->pll;
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>
>>      m = (ctl >> pll_info->m_shift) & GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 0);
>> @@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>> unsigned long parent_rate)
>>      n += pll_info->n_offset;
>>      od_enc = ctl >> pll_info->od_shift;
>>      od_enc &= GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0);
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg);
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>
> I think you should start the patchset with the current [5/5] patch; 
> then you wouldn't have to add spinlock protection here just to see it 
> removed later in the same patchset.
>

OK, I will adjust their order in v3.

Thanks and best regards!

> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
>> +
>>      bypass = !pll_info->no_bypass_bit &&
>>           !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit));
>>
>> @@ -106,7 +111,7 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>> unsigned long parent_rate)
>>      BUG_ON(od == pll_info->od_max);
>>      od++;
>>
>> -    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>> +    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * pll_info->rate_multiplier, 
>> n * od);
>>  }
>>
>>  static unsigned long
>> @@ -139,7 +144,7 @@ ingenic_pll_calc(const struct 
>> ingenic_cgu_clk_info *clk_info,
>>      if (pod)
>>          *pod = od;
>>
>> -    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>> +    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * pll_info->rate_multiplier, 
>> n * od);
>>  }
>>
>>  static inline const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info *to_clk_info(
>> @@ -183,7 +188,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
>> long req_rate,
>>              clk_info->name, req_rate, rate);
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>
>>      ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 0) << pll_info->m_shift);
>>      ctl |= (m - pll_info->m_offset) << pll_info->m_shift;
>> @@ -194,7 +199,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
>> long req_rate,
>>      ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0) << pll_info->od_shift);
>>      ctl |= pll_info->od_encoding[od - 1] << pll_info->od_shift;
>>
>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>
>>      return 0;
>> @@ -212,16 +217,21 @@ static int ingenic_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>      u32 ctl;
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg);
>>
>>      ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit);
>> +
>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg);
>> +
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>> +
>>      ctl |= BIT(pll_info->enable_bit);
>>
>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>
>>      /* wait for the PLL to stabilise */
>>      for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
>> -        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>          if (ctl & BIT(pll_info->stable_bit))
>>              break;
>>          mdelay(1);
>> @@ -245,11 +255,11 @@ static void ingenic_pll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>      u32 ctl;
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>
>>      ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->enable_bit);
>>
>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -263,7 +273,7 @@ static int ingenic_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>      u32 ctl;
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg);
>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>
>>      return !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->enable_bit));
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>> index 0dc8004..f7b6908 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
>>
>>  /**
>>   * struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info - information about a PLL
>> - * @reg: the offset of the PLL's control register within the CGU
>> + * @pll_reg: the offset of the PLL's control register within the CGU
>> + * @bypass_reg: the offset of the bypass control register within the 
>> CGU
>> + * @rate_multiplier: the multiplier needed by pll rate calculation
>>   * @m_shift: the number of bits to shift the multiplier value by 
>> (ie. the
>>   *           index of the lowest bit of the multiplier value in the 
>> PLL's
>>   *           control register)
>> @@ -43,7 +45,9 @@
>>   * @no_bypass_bit: if set, the PLL has no bypass functionality
>>   */
>>  struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info {
>> -    unsigned reg;
>> +    unsigned pll_reg;
>> +    unsigned bypass_reg;
>> +    unsigned rate_multiplier;
>>      const s8 *od_encoding;
>>      u8 m_shift, m_bits, m_offset;
>>      u8 n_shift, n_bits, n_offset;
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-14 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-13 15:21 clk: Ingenic: Add support for the X1830 v2 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust cgu code to make it compatible with X1830 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 21:25   ` Paul Cercueil
2019-12-14 12:16     ` zhouyanjie [this message]
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust code to make it compatible with new cgu code 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add X1830 bindings 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: Ingenic: Add CGU driver for X1830 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: Ingenic: Remove unnecessary spinlock when reading registers 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5DF4D2A0.3010603@wanyeetech.com \
    --to=zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sernia.zhou@foxmail.com \
    --cc=zhenwenjin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).