linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>,
	Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>,
	Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MIPS: CPU#0 is not hotpluggable
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:57:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H7WgGy=NKZ-YwDTQ1HtNT--qp2J8m25RmxpsdUBbmm8oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200725064923.GA1059787@kroah.com>

Hi Greg,

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 2:49 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 02:37:52PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Thomas,
> >
> > What do you think about this patch? Other archs also do the same thing
> > except those support hotplug CPU#0.
> >
> > grep hotpluggable arch -rwI
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c:        cpu->hotpluggable = cpu_has_hotplug(i);
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c:    BUG_ON(!c->hotpluggable);
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c:            c->hotpluggable = 1;
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c:        if (cpu_online(cpu) || c->hotpluggable) {
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:        cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable =
> > platform_can_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
> > arch/sh/kernel/topology.c:        c->hotpluggable = 1;
> > arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c:     * CPEI target, then it is hotpluggable
> > arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c:        sysfs_cpus[num].cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
> > arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:        cpu->hotpluggable = !!i;
> > arch/s390/kernel/smp.c:    c->hotpluggable = 1;
> > arch/mips/kernel/topology.c:        c->hotpluggable = 1;
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c: * In case the boot CPU is hotpluggable,
> > we record its initial state and
> > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c:        cpu->hotpluggable = cpu_can_disable(i);
> > arch/x86/kernel/topology.c:        per_cpu(cpu_devices,
> > num).cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:38 PM Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Now CPU#0 is not hotpluggable on MIPS, so prevent to create /sys/devices
> > > /system/cpu/cpu0/online which confuses some user-space tools.
>
> What userspace tools are confused by this?  They should be able to
> handle a cpu not being able to be removed, right?
It causes ltp's "hotplug" test fails, and ltp considers CPUs with a
"online" node be hotpluggable.

>
>
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/mips/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> > > index cd3e1f8..08ad637 100644
> > > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> > > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
> > >         for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> > >                 struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, i);
> > >
> > > -               c->hotpluggable = 1;
> > > +               c->hotpluggable = !!i;
>
> Seems to be the same as what xtensa did, so it's probably not a big
> deal.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-25  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 10:40 [PATCH V2] MIPS: CPU#0 is not hotpluggable Huacai Chen
2020-07-25  6:37 ` Huacai Chen
2020-07-25  6:49   ` Greg KH
2020-07-25  6:57     ` Huacai Chen [this message]
2020-07-25  7:45       ` Greg KH
2020-07-25  8:29         ` Huacai Chen
2020-07-25  8:57           ` Greg KH
2020-07-26  2:17             ` Jiaxun Yang
2020-07-26  8:25   ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-07-26 11:30     ` Jiaxun Yang
2020-07-26  8:25 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAhV-H7WgGy=NKZ-YwDTQ1HtNT--qp2J8m25RmxpsdUBbmm8oQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=chenhuacai@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=wuzhangjin@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfx@lemote.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).