linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64, mm: Move generic mmap layout functions to mm
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:17:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+NV7nfQ044kvsqqSrWpuXH5J6aZEbvg7YpxyBFjdAHyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190417052247.17809-5-alex@ghiti.fr>

(

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:27 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>
> arm64 handles top-down mmap layout in a way that can be easily reused
> by other architectures, so make it available in mm.
> It then introduces a new config ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
> that can be set by other architectures to benefit from those functions.
> Note that this new config depends on MMU being enabled, if selected
> without MMU support, a warning will be thrown.
>
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
> ---
>  arch/Kconfig                       |  8 ++++
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                 |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h |  2 -
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c               | 76 ------------------------------
>  kernel/sysctl.c                    |  6 ++-
>  mm/util.c                          | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  6 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 33687dddd86a..7c8965c64590 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -684,6 +684,14 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_COMPAT_MMAP_BASES
>           and vice-versa 32-bit applications to call 64-bit mmap().
>           Required for applications doing different bitness syscalls.
>
> +# This allows to use a set of generic functions to determine mmap base
> +# address by giving priority to top-down scheme only if the process
> +# is not in legacy mode (compat task, unlimited stack size or
> +# sysctl_legacy_va_layout).
> +config ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
> +       bool
> +       depends on MMU

I'd prefer the comment were moved to the help text. I would include
any details about what the arch still needs to define. For example
right now, I think STACK_RND_MASK is still needed. (Though I think a
common one could be added for this series too...)

> +
>  config HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
>         bool
>         help
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 7e34b9eba5de..670719a26b45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ config ARM64
>         select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if GCC_VERSION >= 50000 || CC_IS_CLANG
>         select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
>         select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> +       select ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
>         select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
>         select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
>         select ARM_AMBA
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index 5d9ce62bdebd..4de2a2fd605a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -274,8 +274,6 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *ptr)
>                      "nop") : : "p" (ptr));
>  }
>
> -#define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
> -
>  #endif
>
>  extern unsigned long __ro_after_init signal_minsigstksz; /* sigframe size */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> index ac89686c4af8..c74224421216 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -31,82 +31,6 @@
>
>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>
> -/*
> - * Leave enough space between the mmap area and the stack to honour ulimit in
> - * the face of randomisation.
> - */

This comment goes missing in the move...

> -#define MIN_GAP (SZ_128M)
> -#define MAX_GAP        (STACK_TOP/6*5)
> -
> -static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> -{
> -       if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
> -               return 1;
> -
> -       if (rlim_stack->rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
> -               return 1;
> -
> -       return sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
> -}
> -
> -unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
> -{
> -       unsigned long rnd;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> -       if (is_compat_task())
> -               rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_compat_bits) - 1);
> -       else
> -#endif
> -               rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_bits) - 1);
> -       return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -}
> -
> -static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> -{
> -       unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
> -       unsigned long pad = stack_guard_gap;
> -
> -       /* Account for stack randomization if necessary */
> -       if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> -               pad += (STACK_RND_MASK << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -
> -       /* Values close to RLIM_INFINITY can overflow. */
> -       if (gap + pad > gap)
> -               gap += pad;
> -
> -       if (gap < MIN_GAP)
> -               gap = MIN_GAP;
> -       else if (gap > MAX_GAP)
> -               gap = MAX_GAP;
> -
> -       return PAGE_ALIGN(STACK_TOP - gap - rnd);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * This function, called very early during the creation of a new process VM
> - * image, sets up which VM layout function to use:
> - */
> -void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> -{
> -       unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
> -
> -       if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> -               random_factor = arch_mmap_rnd();
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Fall back to the standard layout if the personality bit is set, or
> -        * if the expected stack growth is unlimited:
> -        */
> -       if (mmap_is_legacy(rlim_stack)) {
> -               mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + random_factor;
> -               mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
> -       } else {
> -               mm->mmap_base = mmap_base(random_factor, rlim_stack);
> -               mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown;
> -       }
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * You really shouldn't be using read() or write() on /dev/mem.  This might go
>   * away in the future.
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index e5da394d1ca3..eb3414e78986 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,8 @@ extern struct ctl_table epoll_table[];
>  extern struct ctl_table firmware_config_table[];
>  #endif
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
> +#if defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT) || \
> +    defined(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT)
>  int sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
>  #endif
>
> @@ -1564,7 +1565,8 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
>                 .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
>                 .extra1         = &zero,
>         },
> -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
> +#if defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT) || \
> +    defined(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT)
>         {
>                 .procname       = "legacy_va_layout",
>                 .data           = &sysctl_legacy_va_layout,
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index a54afb9b4faa..5c3393d32ed1 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,12 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
>  #include <linux/elf.h>
> +#include <linux/elf-randomize.h>
> +#include <linux/personality.h>
>  #include <linux/random.h>
> +#include <linux/processor.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> @@ -313,7 +318,74 @@ unsigned long randomize_stack_top(unsigned long stack_top)
>  #endif
>  }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE

I think CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT should select
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE. It would mean moving
arch_randomize_brk() into this patch set too. For arm64 and arm, this
is totally fine: they have identical logic. On MIPS this would mean
bumping the randomization up: arm64 uses SZ_32M for 32-bit and SZ_1G
for 64-bit. MIPS is 8M and 256M respectively. I don't see anything
that indicates this would be a problem. *cross fingers*

It looks like x86 would need bumping too: it uses 32M on both 32-bit
and 64-bit. STACK_RND_MASK is the same though.

> +unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
> +{
> +       unsigned long rnd;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +       if (is_compat_task())
> +               rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_compat_bits) - 1);
> +       else
> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */

The ifdefs on is_compat_task() are not needed: is_compat_task()
returns 0 in the !CONFIG_COMPAT case.

> +               rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_bits) - 1);
> +
> +       return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE */
> +
> +static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> +{
> +       if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
> +               return 1;
> +
> +       if (rlim_stack->rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
> +               return 1;
> +
> +       return sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
> +}
> +
> +#define MIN_GAP                (SZ_128M)
> +#define MAX_GAP                (STACK_TOP / 6 * 5)
> +
> +static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> +{
> +       unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
> +       unsigned long pad = stack_guard_gap;
> +
> +       /* Account for stack randomization if necessary */
> +       if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> +               pad += (STACK_RND_MASK << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +       /* Values close to RLIM_INFINITY can overflow. */
> +       if (gap + pad > gap)
> +               gap += pad;
> +
> +       if (gap < MIN_GAP)
> +               gap = MIN_GAP;
> +       else if (gap > MAX_GAP)
> +               gap = MAX_GAP;
> +
> +       return PAGE_ALIGN(STACK_TOP - gap - rnd);
> +}
> +
> +void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> +{
> +       unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
> +
> +       if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> +               random_factor = arch_mmap_rnd();
> +
> +       if (mmap_is_legacy(rlim_stack)) {
> +               mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + random_factor;
> +               mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
> +       } else {
> +               mm->mmap_base = mmap_base(random_factor, rlim_stack);
> +               mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown;
> +       }
> +}
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT)
>  void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
>  {
>         mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
> --
> 2.20.1
>


--
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17  5:22 [PATCH v3 00/11] Provide generic top-down mmap layout functions Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm, fs: Move randomize_stack_top from fs to mm Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:20   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: Make use of is_compat_task instead of hardcoding this test Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  4:32   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  5:23     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-22 19:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] arm64: Consider stack randomization for mmap base only when necessary Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  4:37   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  5:24     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-22 19:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64, mm: Move generic mmap layout functions to mm Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:17   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-04-18  5:55     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-18 14:19       ` Kees Cook
2019-04-19  7:20         ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-22 19:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-28 14:27         ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-22 19:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] arm: Properly account for stack randomization and stack guard gap Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:26   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:01     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] arm: Use STACK_TOP when computing mmap base address Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:27   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:04     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] arm: Use generic mmap top-down layout Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:28   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:06     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mips: Properly account for stack randomization and stack guard gap Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:30   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:06     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-18 21:27   ` Paul Burton
2019-04-19  7:20     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] mips: Use STACK_TOP when computing mmap base address Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:31   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:08     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mips: Use generic mmap top-down layout Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:31   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:08     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-17  5:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] riscv: Make mmap allocation top-down by default Alexandre Ghiti
2019-04-18  5:31   ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18  6:09     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-04-22 19:56   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGXu5j+NV7nfQ044kvsqqSrWpuXH5J6aZEbvg7YpxyBFjdAHyw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).